BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: tcp: Add SOCK_OPS rcvlowat hook.
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 21:46:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508214634.A0ABBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508073355.3916746-8-kuniyu@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The new BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB hook is incorrectly rejected by is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(), preventing the BPF program from modifying callback flags.
--

commit ef96e613bd920ae4e567781955c5e3d4f11f7f57
Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>

bpf: tcp: Add SOCK_OPS rcvlowat hook.

This commit introduces a new BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB hook that is invoked
when TCP enqueues an skb or completes recvmsg(). The hook allows BPF
programs to dynamically adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat to suppress unnecessary
wakeups.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 7e26503fd96d4..a70a8f5830258 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,12 @@ static void bpf_skops_established(struct sock *sk, int bpf_op,
>  	/* sk with TCP_REPAIR_ON does not have skb in tcp_finish_connect */
>  	bpf_skops_common_locked(sk, bpf_op, skb, skb ? tcp_hdrlen(skb) : 0);
>  }
> +
> +void bpf_skops_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	/* skb is NULL when called from __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(). */
> +	bpf_skops_common_locked(sk, BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB, skb, 0);
> +}

Does this regression prevent the BPF program from dynamically disabling the
hook once the RPC boundaries are known?

Since BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB is greater than BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB,
is_locked_tcp_sock_ops() will return false for this hook:

net/core/filter.c:is_locked_tcp_sock_ops() {
	return bpf_sock->op <= BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB;
}

While this intentionally prevents bpf_setsockopt() from being used
unnecessarily, bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() also relies on this check:

net/core/filter.c:bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() {
	if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
	...
}

This means any attempt to clear the callback flag using
bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() within the hook will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP.
This could force the callback to run on every single SKB enqueue for the
lifetime of the connection.

Should is_locked_tcp_sock_ops() or bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() be updated
to allow disabling the callback flag for this new hook?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508073355.3916746-1-kuniyu@google.com?part=7

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08  7:33 [PATCH v1 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add SOCK_OPS hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 1/8] selftest: bpf: Use BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS + 1 for bad_cb_test_rv Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 19:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 20:21     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 2/8] bpf: tcp: Introduce BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 19:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 20:26     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: tcp: Support bpf_skb_load_bytes() for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 15:15   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 19:45     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-11 14:56       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 4/8] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 5/8] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-11 12:34   ` Björn Töpel
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: tcp: Factorise bpf_skops_established() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: tcp: Add SOCK_OPS rcvlowat hook Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 10:37   ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-08 11:30     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 12:19       ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-08 15:28   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 20:05     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-11 14:55       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 21:46   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-08  7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 8/8] selftest: bpf: Add test for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 15:35   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 20:19     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 21:47       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 21:58         ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 22:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 22:47     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260508214634.A0ABBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox