From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: tcp: Add SOCK_OPS rcvlowat hook.
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 21:46:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508214634.A0ABBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508073355.3916746-8-kuniyu@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The new BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB hook is incorrectly rejected by is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(), preventing the BPF program from modifying callback flags.
--
commit ef96e613bd920ae4e567781955c5e3d4f11f7f57
Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
bpf: tcp: Add SOCK_OPS rcvlowat hook.
This commit introduces a new BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB hook that is invoked
when TCP enqueues an skb or completes recvmsg(). The hook allows BPF
programs to dynamically adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat to suppress unnecessary
wakeups.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 7e26503fd96d4..a70a8f5830258 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,12 @@ static void bpf_skops_established(struct sock *sk, int bpf_op,
> /* sk with TCP_REPAIR_ON does not have skb in tcp_finish_connect */
> bpf_skops_common_locked(sk, bpf_op, skb, skb ? tcp_hdrlen(skb) : 0);
> }
> +
> +void bpf_skops_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + /* skb is NULL when called from __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(). */
> + bpf_skops_common_locked(sk, BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB, skb, 0);
> +}
Does this regression prevent the BPF program from dynamically disabling the
hook once the RPC boundaries are known?
Since BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB is greater than BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB,
is_locked_tcp_sock_ops() will return false for this hook:
net/core/filter.c:is_locked_tcp_sock_ops() {
return bpf_sock->op <= BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB;
}
While this intentionally prevents bpf_setsockopt() from being used
unnecessarily, bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() also relies on this check:
net/core/filter.c:bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() {
if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
...
}
This means any attempt to clear the callback flag using
bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() within the hook will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP.
This could force the callback to run on every single SKB enqueue for the
lifetime of the connection.
Should is_locked_tcp_sock_ops() or bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() be updated
to allow disabling the callback flag for this new hook?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508073355.3916746-1-kuniyu@google.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 7:33 [PATCH v1 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add SOCK_OPS hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 1/8] selftest: bpf: Use BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS + 1 for bad_cb_test_rv Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 19:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 20:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 2/8] bpf: tcp: Introduce BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 19:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 20:26 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: tcp: Support bpf_skb_load_bytes() for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 15:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 19:45 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-11 14:56 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 4/8] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 5/8] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-11 12:34 ` Björn Töpel
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: tcp: Factorise bpf_skops_established() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: tcp: Add SOCK_OPS rcvlowat hook Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 10:37 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-08 11:30 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 12:19 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-08 15:28 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 20:05 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-11 14:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 21:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-08 7:33 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 8/8] selftest: bpf: Add test for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 15:35 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 20:19 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 21:47 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-08 21:58 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-08 22:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 22:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508214634.A0ABBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox