From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mahe Tardy" <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/6] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 16:25:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518162556.BE85AC2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518122842.218522-4-mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The BPF kfunc `bpf_icmp_send()` originates ICMPv6 DEST_UNREACH messages for IPv6 fragments other than the first fragment, violating RFC 4443.
--
commit 7a9ef91672faeb43ff51c256f81255a263f374aa
Author: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc
Adds a bpf_icmp_send() kfunc for cgroup_skb and tc BPF programs to reply
with ICMP/ICMPv6 destination unreachable messages. It clones the packet
to safely generate the ICMP response without altering the original skb,
and includes protection against recursion.
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -12464,6 +12466,110 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_xdp_pull_data(struct xdp_md *x, u32 len)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, bpf_icmp_send_in_progress);
> +
> +/**
> + * bpf_icmp_send - Send an ICMP control message
[ ... ]
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_icmp_send(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx, int type, int code)
> +{
[ ... ]
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
> + if (type != ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + if (code < 0 || code > ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!nskb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (!pskb_network_may_pull(nskb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr))) {
> + kfree_skb(nskb);
> + return -EBADMSG;
> + }
> +
> + if (!skb_dst(nskb) && ip6_route_reply_fill_dst(nskb) < 0) {
> + kfree_skb(nskb);
> + return -EHOSTUNREACH;
> + }
> +
> + memset(IP6CB(nskb), 0, sizeof(struct inet6_skb_parm));
> +
> + *in_progress = true;
> + icmpv6_send(nskb, type, code, 0);
The commit message notes that "icmp_send will only reply to fragment 0".
While IPv4's __icmp_send() explicitly drops non-initial fragments, does
icmpv6_send() provide the same guarantee?
Looking at icmpv6_send(), the internal is_ineligible() check does not seem
to prevent replying to non-initial UDP/TCP fragments. Other kernel subsystems
that originate ICMPv6 errors, such as Netfilter's nf_send_unreach6(), appear
to manually parse extension headers via ipv6_skip_exthdr() and explicitly
drop non-initial fragments.
Will calling icmpv6_send() directly here originate ICMPv6 errors for every
fragment of a dropped fragmented IPv6 packet, violating RFC 4443 Section
2.4 (e.5)?
> + *in_progress = false;
> + kfree_skb(nskb);
> + break;
> +#endif
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260518122842.218522-1-mahe.tardy@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 12:28 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/4] bpf: add icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/6] net: move netfilter nf_reject_fill_skb_dst to core ipv4 Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 13:07 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-18 14:21 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/6] net: move netfilter nf_reject6_fill_skb_dst to core ipv6 Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 13:07 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-18 14:22 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/6] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 13:34 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-18 14:26 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 16:17 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-18 17:18 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 16:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-19 1:33 ` Jordan Rife
2026-05-18 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/6] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc tests Mahe Tardy
2026-05-19 1:34 ` Jordan Rife
2026-05-18 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/6] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc IPv6 tests Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 13:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-18 14:27 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 16:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 18:13 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 12:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/6] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 13:07 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-18 14:39 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-18 17:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518162556.BE85AC2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox