From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: test cases for loop hierarchy computation
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 10:25:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526102514.AFE3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526-better-1m-reporting-v1-3-51e4f2c59780@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The expected verifier log output in `fwd_edges_no_loop` incorrectly expects an unconditional jump `(05)` for a conditional jump instruction, which will cause the selftest to fail.
--
commit f35c2f4d237eac02dd241fbf85f69d40722f62de
Author: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
selftests/bpf: test cases for loop hierarchy computation
This commit adds test cases covering various branches in bpf_compute_loops
for loop hierarchy computation. It includes tests for single bounded loops,
independent loops, nested loops, diamond control flow graphs, and irreducible
loops.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_loop_hierarchy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_loop_hierarchy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..db26157e3e14a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_loop_hierarchy.c
[ ... ]
> +/* Case C: forward edges, no loops. */
> +SEC("socket")
> +__success
> +__log_level(2)
> +__msg(" 0: {{.*}} (b7) r0 = 1")
> +__msg(" 1: {{.*}} (05) goto pc+2")
[Severity: Medium]
Will this test case fail because of a mismatch in the expected verifier log?
The inline assembly below uses "if r0 > 0 goto 1f;", which is a conditional
jump. This translates to opcode 0x25 (if r0 > 0x0 goto pc+2), but the __msg
assertion explicitly expects opcode 0x05 (goto pc+2), which is an
unconditional jump.
> +__msg(" 2: {{.*}} (b7) r0 = 2")
> +__msg(" 3: {{.*}} (05) goto pc+1")
> +__msg(" 4: {{.*}} (b7) r0 = 3")
> +__msg(" 5: {{.*}} (95) exit")
> +__naked void fwd_edges_no_loop(void)
> +{
> + asm volatile (" \
> + r0 = 1; \
> + if r0 > 0 goto 1f; \
> + r0 = 2; \
> + goto 2f; \
> +1: r0 = 3; \
> +2: exit; \
> +" ::: __clobber_all);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260526-better-1m-reporting-v1-0-51e4f2c59780@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 9:30 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/6] bpf: better error reporting when verifier hits 1M instructions limit Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/6] bpf: move live registers and scc printout to a standalone function Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/6] bpf: compute loops hierarchy Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 10:05 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 11:18 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: test cases for loop hierarchy computation Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 10:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-26 11:22 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/6] bpf: report hot simulated callchains when 1M instructions limit is met Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 10:05 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 11:24 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 10:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 11:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 5/6] bpf: report register diff summary for hot callchains Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 10:05 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 11:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 11:36 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-26 9:30 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: test budget exhaustion profiling report Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526102514.AFE3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox