BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 19:57:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526195703.C90E31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526152148.30514-11-boqun@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Using `select HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS` in arch/x86/Kconfig violates Kconfig dependencies and causes build warnings when PREEMPT_COUNT is disabled.
--

commit 0d7b7073a61462aad1916eef1d66b478cea3f90c
Author: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>

preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS

This patch introduces HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS to allow architectures
with 64-bit preempt count support to keep NMI nesting bits in the 32-bit count,
avoiding the need for a separate cache line. It also enables this new
configuration for x86_64.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index f3f7cb01d69d0..bf8288b3d52be 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ config X86
>  	select USER_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
>  	select HAVE_ARCH_KCSAN			if X86_64
>  	select PROC_PID_ARCH_STATUS		if PROC_FS
> +	select HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS		if X86_64

[Severity: Low]
Will this select cause a Kconfig warning about unmet direct dependencies when
PREEMPT_COUNT is disabled?

HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS depends on PREEMPT_COUNT and 64BIT, as
defined in kernel/Kconfig.preempt. Kconfig's select statement forces the target
symbol to 'y' without inheriting or checking its dependencies.

If the kernel is built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y and lock debugging disabled
(leaving PREEMPT_COUNT disabled), this select will produce an unmet dependency
warning.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> index 88c594c6d7fcd..35f546a042b10 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ config PREEMPT_RT_NEEDS_BH_LOCK
>  config PREEMPT_COUNT
>         bool
>  
> +config HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
> +	bool
> +	depends on PREEMPT_COUNT && 64BIT

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260526152148.30514-1-boqun@kernel.org?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-26 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-26 15:21 [PATCH v2 00/12] Refcounted interrupt disable and SpinLockIrq for rust (Part 1) Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] preempt: Track NMI nesting to separate per-CPU counter Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 16:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 12:36   ` Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return() Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 16:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 17:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 10:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-28 14:31     ` Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 18:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Boqun Feng
2026-05-28 10:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-28 14:31     ` Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] sched: Remove the unused preempt_offset parameter of __cant_sleep() Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] sched: Avoid signed comparison of preempt_count() in __cant_migrate() Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 19:57   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 12:40   ` Boqun Feng
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: sched/preempt: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-05-28 10:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] s390/preempt: " Boqun Feng
2026-05-28 10:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-28 14:41     ` Boqun Feng
2026-05-28 15:18       ` Heiko Carstens
2026-05-27 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Refcounted interrupt disable and SpinLockIrq for rust (Part 1) Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-27 16:33   ` Boqun Feng
2026-06-03 19:20     ` Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260526195703.C90E31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox