From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A63C3B19C4; Wed, 27 May 2026 19:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779911362; cv=none; b=PsUVtW8vhNTKi2zgWUNuANhlOs7LNifkgPf+loIeyEV0R1CeCogBG9veUvl3NyAT+d8EoELV/nTkf+zNdYAiSFoXsfoQ0dQMSJd6MbjZIE+KsqBFScL5OsL4axFBlmLDJXVCL8Dx+Lwp24+Oyixb4t1frqhiWjMQI0IsaaVyebw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779911362; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+2/IF8/JJ0MfBQpgoL+K9NYbBdfrHP0u0VxQeTTYRgw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QfEL7dh6mDArvt+Z57N5C6Mg36nhpFaIgTApADPI7DDiywOnyKtwNQwtLYHzj8zXl33xZ4ecGOpTFYyrlCLmrkamnSmwhsVY0fKrxv8Ldr4x6hTn+TBczwJousZAtV1zDatQ1SR1ifBtdROwtM4r31ZZxUjHNyQfGVGA00sg+mg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CWIb2xZo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CWIb2xZo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AA081F000E9; Wed, 27 May 2026 19:49:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779911361; bh=jcVnpiKqpr3a5NXcIfBMM61Zdaozomcn7Ijfq9qQO4A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=CWIb2xZoWpqOmiK+YO9T1NphkVjKZtG8w/LbcNuRAFhZN9tUsWV5t0c/NAMEClSLe lhhYf0UA65DJSI8hUsThl9q5tUJCY1Pd3UhNdFXFK0ilA8Mydu3gkteRQTNuDDDy77 1FbxLaCrowzmZPBWkbV4k04fM11gQ37fuZQGmjg8kibxOXTUyCr9IuT7nAgTHWgOmy IyxnGw9VWMg8Mho0YK/7Z9o3OHHy0MszI12QEYeFTdYWmH07Pedj0/oxekmCSycQ7a LhQc1goo3J/ThiBfv/Q1hBBP8SqXA+kVVpX8G9wlmQm29eUES9i/dmZssW1DH/IPuG 1NETIkiG6XY4A== Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 15:49:18 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jens Remus Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, Dylan Hatch , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf , Indu Bhagat Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 05/20] unwind_user/sframe: Add support for reading .sframe contents Message-ID: <20260527154918.5204c6da@fedora> In-Reply-To: <7fa7ea0c-80fb-4a3e-abc9-8f3dbd7968b1@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260521142546.3908498-6-jremus@linux.ibm.com> <20260521151811.23FD61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> <7fa7ea0c-80fb-4a3e-abc9-8f3dbd7968b1@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 22 May 2026 11:26:00 +0200 Jens Remus wrote: > Previously (see v15) the code was using user_read_access_begin() and > user_read_access_end(). IIUC scoped_user_read_access_size() is just > another mean to express the same and it behaves the same. So if the > issue brought up by Sashiko AI review is valid, then it would also > exist with the previous implementation. Note, Sashiko's reviews are statistical, which means you can get different issues brought up by running it twice on the same code. -- Steve