BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Til Kaiser" <mail@tk154.de>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/4] net: mvpp2: sync RX data at the hardware packet offset
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 16:55:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603165518.96EE11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602164635.62517-2-mail@tk154.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Hardware address confusion in mvpp2_buff_hdr_pool_put leading to wild pointer dereference.
--

commit 5455df1ccac8168f900ec83f5414e617fb3ad72f
Author: Til Kaiser <mail@tk154.de>

net: mvpp2: sync RX data at the hardware packet offset

This commit modifies the DMA sync offset for received packets in mvpp2_rx.
It uses dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu with MVPP2_SKB_HEADROOM so the CPU
sync correctly aligns with the data written by the hardware.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> index f442b874bb593..92a701f4fe3f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> @@ -3946,9 +3946,10 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
>  			dma_dir = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
>  		}
>  
> -		dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev->dev.parent, dma_addr,
> -					rx_bytes + MVPP2_MH_SIZE,
> -					dma_dir);
> +		dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(dev->dev.parent, dma_addr,
> +					      MVPP2_SKB_HEADROOM,
> +					      rx_bytes + MVPP2_MH_SIZE,
> +					      dma_dir);
>  
>  		/* Buffer header not supported */
>  		if (rx_status & MVPP2_RXD_BUF_HDR)

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but when rx_status has
MVPP2_RXD_BUF_HDR set, this code jumps to err_drop_frame and eventually
calls mvpp2_buff_hdr_pool_put(). Does mvpp2_buff_hdr_pool_put() swap the
physical and DMA addresses?

Looking at mvpp2_buff_hdr_pool_put():

	phys_addr = mvpp2_rxdesc_dma_addr_get(port, rx_desc);
	dma_addr = mvpp2_rxdesc_cookie_get(port, rx_desc);

	do {
		buff_hdr = (struct mvpp2_buff_hdr *)phys_to_virt(phys_addr);

It appears that phys_addr is populated with a DMA address and dma_addr is
populated with the physical cookie.

On systems with an IOMMU where DMA addresses do not map 1:1 to physical
addresses, will calling phys_to_virt() on a DMA address cause a wild pointer
dereference? Could this also corrupt the hardware Buffer Manager pool when
passing these swapped addresses into mvpp2_bm_pool_put()?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260602164635.62517-1-mail@tk154.de?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02 16:46 [PATCH net v2 0/4] net: mvpp2: fix XDP RX buffer handling Til Kaiser
2026-06-02 16:46 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] net: mvpp2: sync RX data at the hardware packet offset Til Kaiser
2026-06-03 16:55   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-02 16:46 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] net: mvpp2: limit XDP frame size to the RX buffer Til Kaiser
2026-06-03 16:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 16:46 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] net: mvpp2: do not return retired RX buffers to BM Til Kaiser
2026-06-03 16:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:45   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-02 16:46 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] net: mvpp2: build skb from XDP-adjusted data on XDP_PASS Til Kaiser
2026-06-03 16:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 13:55 ` [PATCH net v2 0/4] net: mvpp2: fix XDP RX buffer handling Alexander Lobakin
2026-06-04 11:30   ` Marcin Wojtas
2026-06-05 12:13 ` [PATCH net v3 " Til Kaiser
2026-06-05 12:13   ` [PATCH net v3 1/4] net: mvpp2: sync RX data at the hardware packet offset Til Kaiser
2026-06-05 12:13   ` [PATCH net v3 2/4] net: mvpp2: limit XDP frame size to the RX buffer Til Kaiser
2026-06-05 12:13   ` [PATCH net v3 3/4] net: mvpp2: refill RX buffers before XDP or skb use Til Kaiser
2026-06-05 12:13   ` [PATCH net v3 4/4] net: mvpp2: build skb from XDP-adjusted data on XDP_PASS Til Kaiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260603165518.96EE11F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@tk154.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox