BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostics report helpers
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 06:42:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605064238.AA12F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605063412.974640-2-memxor@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] High stack consumption in verifier diagnostic helper functions.
- [Low] Premature line wrapping when a word exactly fits the column width.
--

commit aa805d573ef7f7f7b9f1f0f42ddae783a0fb2690
Author: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>

bpf: Add verifier diagnostics report helpers

Add a small diagnostics renderer for verifier reports and wire it into the
BPF build. The initial helpers emit the common text structure: a failure
header plus reusable report sections.

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..a6684adc0c313
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
[ ... ]
> +static void bpf_diag_print_wrapped_prefixed(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> +					    const char *first_prefix,
> +					    const char *next_prefix,
> +					    const char *text)
> +{
[ ... ]
> +		while (line[len] && line[len] != '\n' && len < text_width) {
> +			if (line[len] == ' ')
> +				last_space = len;
> +			len++;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (line[len] && line[len] != '\n' && last_space > 0)
> +			len = last_space;

[Severity: Low]
Does this cause premature line wrapping when a word exactly fits the column
width?

If line[len] is a space where len equals text_width, the condition
line[len] != '\n' evaluates to true, forcing len to revert to last_space.

This prevents the full word from utilizing the available line width.

[ ... ]
> +static void bpf_diag_vprint_indented(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> +				     const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +{
> +	char buf[1024];

[Severity: High]
Does this risk a kernel stack overflow?

A 1024-byte local buffer is allocated on the stack here. Coupled with the
512-byte problem_buf in bpf_diag_report_header(), and large allocations in
other diagnostic functions like bpf_diag_report_source() (over 1.3KB) and
bpf_diag_print_source_annotation() (768 bytes), the total stack consumption
in a single call chain can exceed 2KB.

Could these large stack buffers lead to stack overflow panics in the
deeply-nested BPF verifier?

> +
> +	if (!bpf_verifier_log_needed(&env->log))
> +		return;
> +
> +	vscnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, args);
> +	bpf_diag_print_wrapped_text(env, buf);
> +}
> +
> +void bpf_diag_report_header(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> +			    const char *category, const char *problem)
> +{
> +	char problem_buf[BPF_DIAG_MSG_LEN];

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605063412.974640-1-memxor@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05  6:33 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/17] Redesign Verification Errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostics report helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:42   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05  7:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 18:58   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/17] bpf: Define verifier diagnostic categories Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05 19:10   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/17] bpf: Add source and instruction diagnostic context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  8:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 20:22   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-05 20:55     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05 21:07       ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/17] bpf: Track verifier branch diagnostic history Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:57   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 21:41     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-05 21:37   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/17] bpf: Track verifier register " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 22:31   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/17] bpf: Track verifier reference " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/17] bpf: Track verifier context " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:22   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/17] bpf: Report Register Type Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:23   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/17] bpf: Report Memory Safety bounds errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:57   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/17] bpf: Report Resource Lifetime reference leaks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:22   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/17] bpf: Report Call Type Safety argument errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:23   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/17] bpf: Report Execution Context Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:23   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/17] bpf: Report Program Structure CFG errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:22   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/17] bpf: Report Policy helper and kfunc errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  7:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/17] bpf: Report Verifier Limit errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/17] bpf: Report Verifier Internal errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/17] bpf: Gate verifier diagnostics on log level Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-05  6:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05  7:40   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260605064238.AA12F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox