From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout()
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:23:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608082304.ADEA61F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608080440.127491-8-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `atomic64_cond_read_acquire_timeout` and `atomic64_cond_read_relaxed_timeout` macros can cause torn reads and synchronization failures on 32-bit architectures.
--
commit aafb3af0335d368d82aaca86bf6b2a18f8ae6033
Author: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout()
Add atomic load wrappers, atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() and
atomic64_cond_read_*_timeout() for the cond-load timeout interfaces. Also
add a short description for the interfaces.
> diff --git a/include/linux/atomic.h b/include/linux/atomic.h
> index 8dd57c3a99e9b..5bcb86e077845 100644
> --- a/include/linux/atomic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/atomic.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -31,6 +31,16 @@
> #define atomic64_cond_read_acquire(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire(&(v)->counter, (c))
> #define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed(v, c) smp_cond_load_relaxed(&(v)->counter, (c))
>
> +#define atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +#define atomic_cond_read_relaxed_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +
> +#define atomic64_cond_read_acquire_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +#define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
[Severity: High]
Will this cause torn reads and synchronization failures on 32-bit
architectures?
On 32-bit platforms, atomic64_t operations typically rely on spinlocks or
specific instructions to prevent tearing. These new macros bypass the
architecture-specific atomic64_read() and directly use
smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() and smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() on the
counter member.
These macros poll using a lockless READ_ONCE(). On 32-bit systems, a 64-bit
READ_ONCE() compiles into two separate 32-bit memory loads. If concurrent
writers modify the counter via spinlocked atomic64 operations, the lockless
polling loop could observe torn (partially updated) reads.
If a torn read spuriously satisfies the polling condition, the loop might exit
prematurely with a corrupt value.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608080440.127491-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 8:04 [PATCH v12 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 9:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608082304.ADEA61F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox