BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:32:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608083206.CA8001F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608080440.127491-14-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The new generic smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() and atomic timeout APIs fail to link in loadable modules on ARM64 when KUnit is disabled due to conditionally exported backend functions.
--

commit b5a10ff859d6e282c17d5ed23e24d2c5703beb7a
Author: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()

This commit enables the barrier tests to be built as a module by exporting
__delay_cycles and arch_timer_evtstrm_available specifically for KUnit
environments.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c b/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ u64 notrace __delay_cycles(void)
>  	guard(preempt_notrace)();
>  	return __arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable();
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(__delay_cycles);

[Severity: Medium]
Does exporting this only for KUnit prevent normal kernel modules from using
the generic smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() macro?

Since smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() expands into inline code that calls
__delay_cycles(), a loadable module using this generic API will fail to link
due to an undefined symbol in production kernels where KUnit is disabled.
Should this be unconditionally exported, perhaps via EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -896,6 +897,7 @@ bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void)
>  	 */
>  	return cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), &evtstrm_available);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arch_timer_evtstrm_available);

[Severity: Medium]
Similarly, does conditionally exporting this feature-check break the generic
barrier timeout primitives for modules?

Like __delay_cycles(), arch_timer_evtstrm_available() is called by the
inline implementations of the atomic timeout APIs. Leaving this unexported
for standard kernel configurations could cause link errors for any driver
that uses atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout() or similar macros.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608080440.127491-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-08  8:04 [PATCH v12 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:53   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:53   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:53   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  9:04   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:04 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08  8:34   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260608083206.CA8001F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox