From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:32:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608083206.CA8001F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608080440.127491-14-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The new generic smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() and atomic timeout APIs fail to link in loadable modules on ARM64 when KUnit is disabled due to conditionally exported backend functions.
--
commit b5a10ff859d6e282c17d5ed23e24d2c5703beb7a
Author: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
This commit enables the barrier tests to be built as a module by exporting
__delay_cycles and arch_timer_evtstrm_available specifically for KUnit
environments.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c b/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ u64 notrace __delay_cycles(void)
> guard(preempt_notrace)();
> return __arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable();
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(__delay_cycles);
[Severity: Medium]
Does exporting this only for KUnit prevent normal kernel modules from using
the generic smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() macro?
Since smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() expands into inline code that calls
__delay_cycles(), a loadable module using this generic API will fail to link
due to an undefined symbol in production kernels where KUnit is disabled.
Should this be unconditionally exported, perhaps via EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -896,6 +897,7 @@ bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void)
> */
> return cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), &evtstrm_available);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arch_timer_evtstrm_available);
[Severity: Medium]
Similarly, does conditionally exporting this feature-check break the generic
barrier timeout primitives for modules?
Like __delay_cycles(), arch_timer_evtstrm_available() is called by the
inline implementations of the atomic timeout APIs. Leaving this unexported
for standard kernel configurations could cause link errors for any driver
that uses atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout() or similar macros.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608080440.127491-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com?part=13
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 8:04 [PATCH v12 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 9:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608083206.CA8001F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox