From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joe Damato" <joe@dama.to>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 20:31:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609203144.DB9E41F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608203129.920104-1-joe@dama.to>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Out-of-bounds read of NET_IP_ALIGN bytes when XDP consumes all headroom.
- [High] Leaked XDP fragments or permanent rx_agg_ring exhaustion when rx_skb_func fails.
- [High] Missing DMA Sync on Buffer Reuse corrupts device memory.
- [High] Missing XDP Metadata Handling for large packets.
- [High] Double dma_sync_single_for_cpu destroys XDP payload modifications on non-coherent architectures.
--
commit c05fa36ff7d12821126ed8ba4fc33d7ac7363af0
Author: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
Date: Mon Jun 8 20:31:28 2026 +0000
bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow
The xdp.py test test_xdp_native_adjst_head_grow_data crashes when run on
a bnxt machine (and also crashes in NIPA).
It seems that the bug is an underflow in bnxt_rx_multi_page_skb, which
builds the skb head:
[ ... ]
> The other rx_skb_func implementations don't have this issue.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does bnxt_rx_page_skb() actually have a
similar underflow?
If an XDP program adjusts the head backwards by the full available headroom,
data_ptr is pushed to the beginning of the DMA-mapped fragment.
bnxt_rx_page_skb() then calls:
memcpy(skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN, data_ptr - NET_IP_ALIGN,
payload + NET_IP_ALIGN);
Since data_ptr is at the very beginning of the memory fragment, wouldn't
subtracting NET_IP_ALIGN cause an out-of-bounds read of unmapped memory before
the page?
This same pattern appears to exist in bnxt_copy_data().
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index 35e1f8f663c78..448609cc1617c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -1174,7 +1174,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *bnxt_rx_multi_page_skb(struct bnxt *bp,
[ ... ]
> err = bnxt_alloc_rx_data(bp, rxr, prod, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (unlikely(err)) {
> bnxt_reuse_rx_data(rxr, cons, data);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is device memory corrupted here
when the buffer is reused?
When XDP is active, the buffer is prepared for the CPU using
dma_sync_single_for_cpu(..., DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL).
If the allocation fails here, bnxt_reuse_rx_data() places the buffer back into
the hardware RX ring without calling dma_sync_single_for_device().
Could the CPU cache retain dirty lines that get evicted asynchronously,
corrupting the new packet data when the device DMA writes to this memory?
This also occurs in bnxt_rx_xdp() on XDP_DROP.
> return NULL;
> }
> dma_addr -= bp->rx_dma_offset;
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&bp->pdev->dev, dma_addr, rxr->rx_page_size,
> bp->rx_dir);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but would this redundant sync destroy XDP payload
modifications on non-coherent architectures?
When XDP is active, bnxt_xdp_buff_init() already prepares the packet for the
CPU. The XDP program executes and may modify the packet payload in the CPU cache.
If dma_sync_single_for_cpu() is called again here unconditionally with
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, it might invalidate the CPU cache on non-coherent
architectures (like ARM64), causing the CPU to read stale packet data from RAM
and lose the XDP modifications.
This same pattern appears to exist in bnxt_rx_page_skb().
> - skb = napi_build_skb(data_ptr - bp->rx_offset, rxr->rx_page_size);
> + frag_off = dma_addr - page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
> + frag_start = page_address(page) + frag_off;
> + skb = napi_build_skb(frag_start, rxr->rx_page_size);
> if (!skb) {
> page_pool_recycle_direct(rxr->page_pool, page);
> return NULL;
> }
> skb_mark_for_recycle(skb);
> - skb_reserve(skb, bp->rx_offset);
> + skb_reserve(skb, data_ptr - (u8 *)frag_start);
> __skb_put(skb, len);
>
> return skb;
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing this I noticed
that XDP metadata might be dropped for large packets in bnxt_rx_pkt():
skb = bp->rx_skb_func(bp, rxr, cons, data, data_ptr, dma_addr,
payload | len);
The SKB builder function (like bnxt_rx_multi_page_skb) is called without passing
the metadata length, and skb_metadata_set() is never called on this path.
Are XDP metadata silently dropped for all packets larger than rx_copybreak?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could an allocation failure here cause a leak?
In bnxt_rx_pkt():
skb = bp->rx_skb_func(bp, rxr, cons, data, data_ptr, dma_addr,
payload | len);
if (!skb)
goto oom_next_rx;
If the SKB allocation fails (e.g., OOM), the code jumps directly to oom_next_rx,
bypassing the cleanup block for aggregated fragments (agg_bufs).
For XDP, these fragments are owned by the xdp_buff and must be freed using
bnxt_xdp_buff_frags_free(). For non-XDP, they must be skipped via
bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs().
Does bypassing this cleanup lead to a permanent page pool memory leak (for XDP)
or permanent exhaustion of the hardware rx_agg_ring (for non-XDP)?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608203129.920104-1-joe@dama.to?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 20:31 [PATCH net] bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow Joe Damato
2026-06-09 4:22 ` Michael Chan
2026-06-09 14:50 ` Joe Damato
2026-06-09 16:44 ` Michael Chan
2026-06-09 17:22 ` Joe Damato
2026-06-09 17:33 ` Michael Chan
2026-06-09 17:34 ` Joe Damato
2026-06-09 20:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609203144.DB9E41F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joe@dama.to \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox