From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Better build_id caching in stack_map_get_build_id_offset()
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:20:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609212010.AC2331F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609210749.3448062-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] In the non-sleepable path, stack trace IPs falling into unmapped holes are incorrectly associated with the next adjacent VMA, producing bogus build IDs and out-of-bounds offsets.
--
commit 1e578af5039b6e5b0dc36373f9670148568cdb2a
Author: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
bpf: Better build_id caching in stack_map_get_build_id_offset()
This commit introduces a shared caching mechanism for build IDs between the
sleepable and non-sleepable paths of stack_map_get_build_id_offset(). It
tracks both resolved and unresolved VMAs to avoid repeating lookups and
parses for adjacent stack frames.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260525223948.1920986-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4Bza2fRDGhLQoPE-EzM7F34xaEJfi5Exmxb-iWVUN3F06=g@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZXJFr=1iiVx937ht=4PYQkQHg=eFk810zhMDzXQG3ihw@mail.gmail.com/
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 77ba03216c09f..6a642d6526c02 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -365,27 +430,29 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>
> for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
> u64 ip = READ_ONCE(id_offs[i].ip);
> - u64 offset;
>
> - if (prev_build_id && range_in_vma(prev_vma, ip, ip)) {
> - vma = prev_vma;
> - offset = stack_map_build_id_offset(vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_start, ip);
> - stack_map_build_id_set_valid(&id_offs[i], offset, prev_build_id);
> + if (!stack_map_build_id_set_from_cache(&cache, &id_offs[i], ip))
> continue;
> - }
> +
> vma = find_vma(current->mm, ip);
> if (!vma || vma_is_anonymous(vma) ||
> fetch_build_id(vma, id_offs[i].build_id, may_fault)) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does using find_vma() here allow IPs from
unmapped regions to incorrectly bind to the next adjacent VMA?
Since find_vma() returns the first VMA where vm_end > ip without checking
if ip >= vm_start, an unmapped IP could incorrectly fall into this path.
If that happens, computing the file offset later in the loop via
stack_map_build_id_offset() does:
(vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + ip - vm_start;
Could this calculation underflow and produce a massive out-of-bounds offset
if ip < vma->vm_start?
The sleepable variant avoids this because stack_map_lock_vma() uses
vma_lookup() internally, which guarantees the IP falls strictly within the VMA
boundaries. Should this non-sleepable path also be converted to use
vma_lookup(), or explicitly check if ip >= vma->vm_start?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609210749.3448062-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 21:07 [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Better build_id caching in stack_map_get_build_id_offset() Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-09 21:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 21:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-09 21:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609212010.AC2331F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox