From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: chenyuan_fl@163.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] libbpf: fetch probeable prog type from token for feature probes
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:04:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610150415.F315F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610145059.113412-3-chenyuan_fl@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Feature probes for FEAT_BPF_COOKIE and FEAT_PROBE_READ_KERN will unconditionally fail because they test helpers unsupported by the dynamically selected BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER.
--
commit 0109a2d3173a7dbf585e1f1ba9c12c5a9120c9eb
Author: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
libbpf: fetch probeable prog type from token for feature probes
This commit updates feature probes to dynamically select a program type
based on the provided BPF token instead of hardcoding SOCKET_FILTER or
TRACEPOINT. If no token is provided, it defaults to SOCKET_FILTER.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
> index b7e388f99d0bb..f008ee50e2466 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -257,8 +318,13 @@ static int probe_kern_probe_read_kernel(int token_fd)
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> };
> int fd, insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns);
> + int prog_type;
>
> - fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, NULL, "GPL", insns, insn_cnt, &opts);
> + prog_type = token_probeable_prog_type(token_fd);
> + if (prog_type < 0)
> + return 1;
> +
> + fd = bpf_prog_load(prog_type, NULL, "GPL", insns, insn_cnt, &opts);
[Severity: High]
Will this unconditionally fail the probe for FEAT_PROBE_READ_KERN?
If no token is provided, or the token allows SOCKET_FILTER,
token_probeable_prog_type() returns BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER.
Because SOCKET_FILTER does not support the bpf_probe_read_kernel helper,
the verifier will reject the load with an unknown func error.
Does this result in libbpf falsely reporting the feature as missing for
all applications?
[ ... ]
> @@ -435,8 +507,13 @@ static int probe_kern_bpf_cookie(int token_fd)
> .prog_flags = token_fd ? BPF_F_TOKEN_FD : 0,
> );
> int ret, insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns);
> + int prog_type;
>
> - ret = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, NULL, "GPL", insns, insn_cnt, &opts);
> + prog_type = token_probeable_prog_type(token_fd);
> + if (prog_type < 0)
> + return 1;
> +
> + ret = bpf_prog_load(prog_type, NULL, "GPL", insns, insn_cnt, &opts);
[Severity: High]
Similarly, will this break the FEAT_BPF_COOKIE probe?
If prog_type resolves to BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, it will not support
the bpf_get_attach_cookie helper being tested here, causing the verifier
to reject the probe program.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610145059.113412-1-chenyuan_fl@163.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 3:16 [PATCH] selftests/bpf: fix token tests for bpf_object__prepare() probe_loading chenyuan_fl
2026-05-29 3:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 3:57 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] libbpf: fix implicit BPF token handling in loading and feature probes chenyuan_fl
2026-06-04 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] libbpf: Skip bpf_object__probe_loading() when BPF token is in use chenyuan_fl
2026-06-04 4:05 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 11:16 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-06-08 18:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-09 13:11 ` [PATCH bpf] " chenyuan_fl
2026-06-09 13:35 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-06-09 13:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add ARRAY map type to token tests that use struct_ops global data chenyuan_fl
2026-06-04 3:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 18:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-04 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] libbpf: fix feature probe failures for implicit BPF tokens chenyuan_fl
2026-06-04 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 4:05 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 14:40 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-06-08 18:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-10 14:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] libbpf: fix implicit BPF token feature probe failures chenyuan_fl
2026-06-10 14:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] libbpf: Skip bpf_object__probe_loading() when BPF token is in use chenyuan_fl
2026-06-10 16:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-10 14:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] libbpf: fetch probeable prog type from token for feature probes chenyuan_fl
2026-06-10 15:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 16:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610150415.F315F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox