BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Jamie Hill-Daniel <clubby789@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jamie Hill-Daniel <jamie@hill-daniel.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] seccomp: Allow using `SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT` with `SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER`
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 21:14:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202606122110.28245E2D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526-seccomp-combined-v1-0-304b1cc3ad24@hill-daniel.co.uk>

On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 04:32:14PM +0100, Jamie Hill-Daniel wrote:
> This patch adjusts the logic used by seccomp to allow applying both
> `SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER` and `SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT` to the same process.

Honestly, SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT is kinda deprecated. Nothing new should be
using it.

> Currently, once seccomp has been initialized, a process may not
> transition to a different mode (only add additional filters).
> This means that in container environments such as Docker, which by
> default runs with `SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER`, processes may not enable
> `SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT`. This is an obstacle to using applications
> requiring `SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT` in these environments, and requires
> disabling these security measures.

What applications do you have that need SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT and why
can't they be modified to use FILTER?

> When subsequently running secure computing checks, we run the strict
> checks followed by any installed filters.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/42082

This doesn't show any particular application, just a demo program.

I'd *really* prefer to only add complexity to seccomp if it is
absolutely needed.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-13  4:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-26 15:32 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] seccomp: Allow using `SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT` with `SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER` Jamie Hill-Daniel
2026-05-26 15:32 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] " Jamie Hill-Daniel
2026-05-26 16:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 19:25   ` Will Drewry
2026-06-12 21:24     ` Andy Lutomirski
2026-06-12 22:01       ` clubby789
2026-06-12 22:37         ` Andy Lutomirski
2026-06-12 22:58           ` clubby789
2026-06-12 22:37     ` clubby789
2026-06-12 22:50       ` Andy Lutomirski
2026-05-26 15:32 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] selftest: seccomp: Adjust test for using both `STRICT` and `FILTER` Jamie Hill-Daniel
2026-05-26 16:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-13  4:14 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2026-06-15 16:23   ` [PATCH RESEND 0/2] seccomp: Allow using `SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT` with `SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER` Jamie Hill-Daniel
2026-06-15 22:38     ` Kees Cook
2026-06-15 23:16       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202606122110.28245E2D@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clubby789@gmail.com \
    --cc=jamie@hill-daniel.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox