From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com>,
Zvi Effron <zeffron@riotgames.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
Tamir Duberstein <tamird@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 5/6] libbpf: ringbuf: Prevent missed wakeups
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 21:48:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260613-bpf-ringbuf-fixes-v1-5-e623481cb724@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260613-bpf-ringbuf-fixes-v1-0-e623481cb724@kernel.org>
After consuming the last visible record, ringbuf_process_ring()
publishes the consumer position and checks the producer position. These
operations lack a full StoreLoad barrier. A producer can therefore
commit a new record but read the old consumer position while the
consumer reads the old producer position. The producer sends no
notification and the consumer waits despite a queued record.
Insert a full barrier before checking for new data, ensuring that either
the consumer observes the producer update or the producer observes the
consumer update and sends a notification. Apply the same handshake when
a busy record follows records whose consumer position was published.
Add an edge-triggered epoll test with a concurrent producer. Without the
barrier, a missed notification leaves the producer dropping records from
a full ring while the consumer times out. Document that bounded
consumers and callbacks that terminate consumption must drain before
waiting again.
Fixes: bf99c936f947 ("libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support")
Reported-by: Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 22 +++++++
tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c | 14 +++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 9ba6b9ad3498..a3b8f606a91d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -1439,6 +1439,10 @@ struct ring_buffer;
struct ring;
struct user_ring_buffer;
+/* A negative return stops consumption; non-negative values continue. Stopping
+ * can leave records queued without a new readiness notification. Before
+ * waiting for readiness again, consume until no records remain.
+ */
typedef int (*ring_buffer_sample_fn)(void *ctx, void *data, size_t size);
struct ring_buffer_opts {
@@ -1455,6 +1459,20 @@ LIBBPF_API int ring_buffer__add(struct ring_buffer *rb, int map_fd,
ring_buffer_sample_fn sample_cb, void *ctx);
LIBBPF_API int ring_buffer__poll(struct ring_buffer *rb, int timeout_ms);
LIBBPF_API int ring_buffer__consume(struct ring_buffer *rb);
+
+/**
+ * @brief **ring_buffer__consume_n()** consumes up to a requested number of
+ * records from a ring buffer manager without event polling.
+ *
+ * @param rb A ring buffer manager object.
+ * @param n Maximum number of records to consume.
+ * @return The number of records consumed, or a negative error code on failure.
+ *
+ * Reaching the requested bound does not establish that every ring is empty.
+ * Records can remain queued without a new readiness notification. Before
+ * waiting on ring_buffer__epoll_fd(), call ring_buffer__consume() until it
+ * returns 0.
+ */
LIBBPF_API int ring_buffer__consume_n(struct ring_buffer *rb, size_t n);
LIBBPF_API int ring_buffer__epoll_fd(const struct ring_buffer *rb);
@@ -1537,6 +1555,10 @@ LIBBPF_API int ring__consume(struct ring *r);
* @param r A ringbuffer object.
* @param n Maximum number of records to consume.
* @return The number of records consumed, or a negative error code on failure.
+ *
+ * Reaching the requested bound does not establish that the ring is empty.
+ * Records can remain queued without a new readiness notification. Before
+ * waiting on ring__map_fd(), call ring__consume() until it returns 0.
*/
LIBBPF_API int ring__consume_n(struct ring *r, size_t n);
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
index 1c24a83f59d5..ea8909fec4e9 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int64_t ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring *r, size_t n)
/* 64-bit to avoid overflow in case of extreme application behavior */
int64_t cnt = 0;
unsigned long cons_pos, prod_pos;
- bool got_new_data;
+ bool got_new_data, needs_wakeup = false;
void *sample;
err = ringbuf_validate(r);
@@ -267,14 +267,21 @@ static int64_t ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring *r, size_t n)
cons_pos = __atomic_load_n(r->consumer_pos, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
do {
got_new_data = false;
+ if (needs_wakeup) {
+ /* Ensure either this sees a new record or its producer sees
+ * the updated consumer position and sends a notification.
+ */
+ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
+ needs_wakeup = false;
+ }
prod_pos = __atomic_load_n(r->producer_pos, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
while (cons_pos != prod_pos) {
len_ptr = r->data + (cons_pos & r->mask);
len = __atomic_load_n(len_ptr, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
- /* sample not committed yet, bail out for now */
+ /* Retry a busy record once after publishing prior records. */
if (len & BPF_RINGBUF_BUSY_BIT)
- goto done;
+ break;
got_new_data = true;
cons_pos += roundup_len(len);
@@ -294,6 +301,7 @@ static int64_t ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring *r, size_t n)
__atomic_store_n(r->consumer_pos, cons_pos,
__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
+ needs_wakeup = true;
if (cnt >= n)
goto done;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c
index 9ce996bcea8c..5f0c679bf9a6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf.c
@@ -492,6 +492,88 @@ static void ringbuf_null_cb_subtest(void)
test_ringbuf_n_lskel__destroy(skel_n);
}
+#define N_WAKEUP_SAMPLES 20000
+
+struct wakeup_ctx {
+ bool stop;
+};
+
+static void *wakeup_producer(void *arg)
+{
+ struct wakeup_ctx *ctx = arg;
+
+ while (!__atomic_load_n(&ctx->stop, __ATOMIC_RELAXED))
+ syscall(__NR_getpgid);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void ringbuf_wakeup_subtest(void)
+{
+ struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n;
+ struct ring_buffer *ringbuf = NULL;
+ struct epoll_event event = {
+ .events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET,
+ };
+ struct wakeup_ctx ctx = {};
+ pthread_t producer;
+ int epoll_fd = -1;
+ int err, total = 0;
+
+ skel_n = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_n, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__open"))
+ return;
+
+ skel_n->maps.ringbuf.max_entries = getpagesize();
+ skel_n->bss->pid = getpid();
+ skel_n->bss->value = SAMPLE_VALUE;
+
+ err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load(skel_n);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach(skel_n);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ringbuf_n_lskel__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(skel_n->maps.ringbuf.map_fd,
+ process_noop_sample, NULL, NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ringbuf, "ring_buffer__new"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ epoll_fd = epoll_create1(EPOLL_CLOEXEC);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(epoll_fd, "epoll_create1"))
+ goto cleanup_ringbuf;
+
+ err = epoll_ctl(epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, skel_n->maps.ringbuf.map_fd,
+ &event);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "epoll_ctl"))
+ goto cleanup_epoll;
+
+ err = pthread_create(&producer, NULL, wakeup_producer, &ctx);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
+ goto cleanup_epoll;
+
+ while (total < N_WAKEUP_SAMPLES) {
+ err = epoll_wait(epoll_fd, &event, 1, 1000);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 1, "epoll_wait"))
+ goto cleanup_thread;
+ while ((err = ring_buffer__consume(ringbuf)) > 0)
+ total += err;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "ring_buffer__consume"))
+ goto cleanup_thread;
+ }
+
+cleanup_thread:
+ __atomic_store_n(&ctx.stop, true, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ pthread_join(producer, NULL);
+cleanup_epoll:
+ close(epoll_fd);
+cleanup_ringbuf:
+ ring_buffer__free(ringbuf);
+cleanup:
+ test_ringbuf_n_lskel__destroy(skel_n);
+}
+
static void ringbuf_n_subtest(void)
{
struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n;
@@ -672,6 +754,8 @@ void test_ringbuf(void)
ringbuf_n_subtest();
if (test__start_subtest("ringbuf_null_cb"))
ringbuf_null_cb_subtest();
+ if (test__start_subtest("ringbuf_wakeup"))
+ ringbuf_wakeup_subtest();
if (test__start_subtest("ringbuf_map_key"))
ringbuf_map_key_subtest();
if (test__start_subtest("ringbuf_write"))
--
2.55.0.rc0.96.gc050c23164
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-14 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-14 1:48 [PATCH bpf 0/6] libbpf: Fix ring buffer consumption Tamir Duberstein
2026-06-14 1:48 ` [PATCH bpf 1/6] libbpf: ringbuf: Honor zero consume bounds Tamir Duberstein
2026-06-14 1:48 ` [PATCH bpf 2/6] libbpf: ringbuf: Prevent NULL callback crash Tamir Duberstein
2026-06-14 1:48 ` [PATCH bpf 3/6] libbpf: ringbuf: Handle position counter wrap Tamir Duberstein
2026-06-14 2:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 1:48 ` [PATCH bpf 4/6] libbpf: ringbuf: Use compiler atomics Tamir Duberstein
2026-06-14 1:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 1:48 ` Tamir Duberstein [this message]
2026-06-14 1:57 ` [PATCH bpf 5/6] libbpf: ringbuf: Prevent missed wakeups sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 1:48 ` [PATCH bpf 6/6] libbpf: ringbuf: Reject overwrite callback use Tamir Duberstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260613-bpf-ringbuf-fixes-v1-5-e623481cb724@kernel.org \
--to=tamird@kernel.org \
--cc=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=awerner32@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huawei.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=zeffron@riotgames.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox