From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/1] tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback for TCP Prague
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:19:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615071903.2B0671F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260614071756.239686-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] BPF programs can cause a kernel panic by passing `mss_now == 0` to the `bbr_tso_segs` kfunc, leading to a division by zero.
- [Medium] The `tcp_tso_autosize` function is not registered as a BPF kfunc, preventing BPF congestion control algorithms from reusing default TSO autosizing logic.
--
commit 39a9bf39a3860ba9dd1b2bed8669b97491df87c6
Author: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback for TCP Prague
This patch replaces existing min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callbak
for CC algorithm to provides explicit tso segment number of each data
burst and overrides tcp_tso_autosize().
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -297,11 +297,19 @@ static void bbr_set_pacing_rate(struct sock *sk, u32 bw, int gain)
> }
>
> /* override sysctl_tcp_min_tso_segs */
> -__bpf_kfunc static u32 bbr_min_tso_segs(struct sock *sk)
> +static u32 bbr_min_tso_segs(struct sock *sk)
> {
> return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_rate) < (bbr_min_tso_rate >> 3) ? 1 : 2;
> }
>
> +__bpf_kfunc static u32 bbr_tso_segs(struct sock *sk, u32 mss_now)
> +{
> + u32 min_tso;
> +
> + min_tso = bbr_min_tso_segs(sk);
> + return tcp_tso_autosize(sk, mss_now, min_tso);
> +}
[Severity: High]
Can a buggy BPF program trigger a divide-by-zero panic here?
Since bbr_tso_segs() is exposed as a BPF kfunc, the verifier does not
restrict the value ranges of scalar arguments like mss_now. If mss_now is 0,
it is passed directly to tcp_tso_autosize(), where it is used as a divisor:
tcp_tso_autosize()
...
return max_t(u32, bytes / mss_now, min_tso_segs);
Does this need an explicit check for mss_now == 0 to prevent a local denial
of service?
> +
> static u32 bbr_tso_segs_goal(struct sock *sk)
> {
> struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2269,6 +2269,7 @@ static u32 tcp_tso_autosize(const struct sock *sk, unsigned int mss_now,
>
> return max_t(u32, bytes / mss_now, min_tso_segs);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_tso_autosize);
[Severity: Medium]
Is there a way for out-of-tree BPF congestion controls to reuse the default
autosizing logic?
With the removal of min_tso_segs, BPF congestion control algorithms that
want a custom minimum TSO size must implement tso_segs and handle the
autosizing themselves. However, while tcp_tso_autosize() is exported to C
modules here, it does not appear to be registered as a BPF kfunc (e.g., via
BTF_KFUNCS_START).
Does this force BPF developers to either lose custom minimum TSO sizing
capabilities or duplicate the tcp_tso_autosize() logic within their BPF
programs?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260614071756.239686-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com?part=1
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260614071756.239686-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
2026-06-15 7:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 1:51 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/1] tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback for TCP Prague Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-16 2:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615071903.2B0671F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox