BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 4/9] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:25:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615112506.131D51F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-v3-4-70a54f3775bb@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Acquiring a local_trylock inside a raw_spinlock_t wait context triggers a lockdep Invalid wait context warning.
--

commit 05f00697f28bd84542538d9e89bbc00e3f7a427a
Author: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>

mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled

This commit modifies the fallback logic for deferred RCU freeing in the
slab allocator. It now uses call_rcu() even in an unknown context as long
as interrupts are enabled.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAADnVQKRVD5ZSnEKbZZU7w86gHbGHUug2pvzpgZTngNS+fg4rw@mail.gmail.com

> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index b0d38d5153865..6a3552b70683d 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -6158,8 +6158,8 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, bool allow_spin)
>  	if (likely(rcu_sheaf->size < s->sheaf_capacity)) {
>  		rcu_sheaf = NULL;
>  	} else {
> -		if (unlikely(!allow_spin)) {
> -			/* call_rcu() cannot be called in an unknown context */
> +		/* call_rcu() disables IRQs to protect percpu data structures */

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since you are modifying
__kfree_rcu_sheaf() here, can this function trigger an invalid wait context
warning in lockdep?

According to the RCU guidelines, kvfree_call_rcu() is frequently called
while holding a raw_spinlock_t (such as pi_lock in kernel/sched/core.c)
and from hardirq context:

mm/slab_common.c:kvfree_call_rcu() {
    ...
    if (kfree_rcu_sheaf(ptr))
        return;
    ...
}

This calls into __kfree_rcu_sheaf(), which unconditionally attempts to
acquire a local_lock earlier in the function:

mm/slub.c:__kfree_rcu_sheaf() {
    ...
    if (!local_trylock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock))
        goto fail;
    ...
}

Because local_lock has a lower lockdep wait type than raw_spinlock_t,
does this wait context inversion violate nesting rules and trigger
warnings? 

Guarding lock_map_acquire_try with !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) does not
prevent this because local_trylock internally checks wait contexts
regardless. Could this lead to panics on systems with panic_on_warn enabled?

> +		if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
>  			rcu_sheaf->size--;
>  			local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
>  			goto fail;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-v3-0-70a54f3775bb@kernel.org?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15 11:05 [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/9] slub_kunit: fall back to SW perf events when HW PMU is not available Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 12:58   ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/9] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 20:04   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 3/9] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 4/9] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 5/9] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 6/9] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 7/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 8/9] mm/slab: introduce struct kfree_rcu_head and use in kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 9/9] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:43 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260615112506.131D51F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox