From: Avinash Duduskar <avinash.duduskar@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
emil@etsalapatis.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
hawk@kernel.org, yatsenko@meta.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kpsingh@kernel.org, a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, rongtao@cestc.cn, eyal.birger@gmail.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
toke@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: bidirectional VLAN support for bpf_fib_lookup()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:21:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623025147.1001664-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com> (raw)
This series adds VLAN awareness to bpf_fib_lookup() in both directions.
BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN resolves a VLAN egress to its underlying real device
plus the VLAN tag (XDP programs need this because VLAN devices have no XDP
xmit), and BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT runs the lookup as if a tagged frame
had arrived on the matching VLAN subinterface, for iif policy routing and
VRF table selection.
The independent l3mdev/VRF flow-init fix, patch 1 in v1 and v2, was split
out and merged to bpf separately.
v4 changes what bpf_fib_lookup() returns in one case. v3 left a VLAN
egress that cannot be reduced to a physical device plus one tag (a QinQ
egress, or a parent in another namespace) as best-effort SUCCESS with
the VLAN device's ifindex. In his v3 review Toke asked for a distinct
error code there instead, so an XDP program cannot mistake an unresolved
VLAN egress for a physical one, and suggested the name
BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_VLAN_FAILURE; v4 implements that. The
code is appended after BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_SRC_ADDR (nothing renumbered,
tools/ mirror updated) and is returned only when BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN is
set, so no existing caller can observe it. On that failure params->ifindex
is left at the input, like the input-side failures; a tc or XDP program
that wants the VLAN device's own ifindex re-issues the lookup without the
flag, the recovery path he described.
The reason for a distinct code rather than best-effort SUCCESS: SUCCESS
on an unreducible egress silently blackholed XDP. A redirect to the VLAN
device drops at xdp_do_flush() with no in-band signal to the program;
VLAN_FAILURE makes the unreducible case explicit, and a live-frames
selftest exercises both the redirected and the passed paths. Only the
immediate parent is resolved, so QinQ and foreign-netns are the
unreducible cases; bond, team, TBID and VRF egress resolve, as the
selftest table pins.
Changes v3 -> v4:
- Patch 1: return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_VLAN_FAILURE for an unreducible VLAN
egress, leaving params->ifindex at the input.
- Patch 3: the QinQ-egress and cross-namespace-egress arms expect
VLAN_FAILURE; an escape-hatch arm re-issues without the flag for the
inner VLAN device's ifindex; and test_fib_lookup_vlan_redirect drives
live frames (BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES) through the native redirect
path, asserting a reducible egress is delivered and a QinQ egress is
passed to the stack. The selftest's VLAN_FAILURE arms are IPv4 only,
since bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup() restores params->ifindex with the same code
as the IPv4 path that the arms exercise.
The three other v3 questions Toke marked fine as-is, and v4 keeps them: an
unmatched, down, or cross-namespace tag on input returns NOT_FWDED;
OUTPUT | VLAN_INPUT is rejected with -EINVAL; the BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT
name is kept.
Taking the tag as lookup input follows the approach David Ahern suggested
in the 2021 fwmark discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6248c547-ad64-04d6-fcec-374893cc1ef2@gmail.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260617224729.1428662-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616223426.3568080-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609172052.81613-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/
Avinash Duduskar (3):
bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper
bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper
selftests/bpf: Add bpf_fib_lookup() VLAN flag tests
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 47 +-
net/core/filter.c | 133 +++-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 47 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fib_lookup.c | 696 +++++++++++++++++-
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fib_lookup.c | 36 +
5 files changed, 930 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
base-commit: a975094bf98ca97be9146f9d3b5681a6f9cf5ce3
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 2:51 Avinash Duduskar [this message]
2026-06-23 2:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper Avinash Duduskar
2026-06-23 11:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-06-23 18:28 ` Avinash Duduskar
2026-06-23 2:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT " Avinash Duduskar
2026-06-23 12:00 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-06-23 2:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_fib_lookup() VLAN flag tests Avinash Duduskar
2026-06-23 3:39 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-23 12:36 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623025147.1001664-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com \
--to=avinash.duduskar@gmail.com \
--cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rongtao@cestc.cn \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox