BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yichong Chen" <chenyichong@uniontech.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tools/bpf/bpftool: Reset vmlinux BTF after struct_ops commands
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 07:36:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623073607.27FC21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871EC84E76334A24+20260623072220.1421837-3-chenyichong@uniontech.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] Severe memory leak of the btf_vmlinux object during cgroup tree traversal or repeated cgroup commands in batch mode.
--

commit f6cbf97292c743366f83c8ee625e792b14e79b4f
Author: Yichong Chen <chenyichong@uniontech.com>

tools/bpf/bpftool: Reset vmlinux BTF after struct_ops commands

struct_ops frees the global btf_vmlinux object. In batch mode, a later
struct_ops command can reuse stale state. This resets the BTF pointer
and cached map info state.

> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
> index aa43dead249cb..4dba7c96e5f60 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -642,7 +651,7 @@ int do_struct_ops(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>  	err = cmd_select(cmds, argc, argv, do_help);
>  
> -	btf__free(btf_vmlinux);
> +	free_btf_vmlinux();
>  

[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while you are fixing the batch mode state
for struct_ops, could a similar btf_vmlinux memory leak be occurring in
cgroup commands?

Looking at tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c:do_show():

	btf_vmlinux = libbpf_find_kernel_btf();

In batch mode, does every cgroup show command overwrite the global
btf_vmlinux pointer without freeing the previous BTF object?

Similarly, in tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c:do_show_tree_fn():

	btf_vmlinux = libbpf_find_kernel_btf();

During a cgroup tree command, nftw() calls this function for every cgroup
directory. Does it load a new kernel BTF object each time and overwrite the
global pointer without freeing the previous one, creating a leak that scales
with the size of the cgroup hierarchy?

>  	return err;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623072220.1421837-1-chenyichong@uniontech.com?part=2

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260623072220.1421837-1-chenyichong@uniontech.com>
2026-06-23  7:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] tools/bpf/bpftool: Reset vmlinux BTF after map commands Yichong Chen
2026-06-23  7:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23  7:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] tools/bpf/bpftool: Reset vmlinux BTF after struct_ops commands Yichong Chen
2026-06-23  7:36   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623073607.27FC21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenyichong@uniontech.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox