From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Naveed Khan" <naveed@digiscrypt.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libbpf: bounds-check float size in btf_dump_float_data()
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 10:23:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624102301.2B8401F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178229582410.80761.16669701451820050202@digiscrypt.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A malicious BTF can bypass size checks by defining a FLOAT or PTR member with a bitfield size, leading to an out-of-bounds memory read.
- [High] A mismatch between the target BTF alignment and the host architecture alignment requirements can cause an unaligned memory access crash when reading floats.
--
commit 8b775a18b4de3665e91e05ddb075a75dc6ae1b43
Author: Naveed Khan <naveed@digiscrypt.com>
Subject: libbpf: bounds-check float size in btf_dump_float_data()
This commit fixes a stack buffer overflow in btf_dump_float_data() by
validating the float size before copying it into an on-stack buffer. It also
changes the buffer to be 16-byte aligned so that valid long double floats
are always accepted.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
> index cc1ba65bb6c5a..dc26f3a160305 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
> @@ -1980,13 +1980,18 @@ static int btf_dump_float_data(struct btf_dump *d,
[ ... ]
> /* handle unaligned data; copy to local buffer */
> if (!ptr_is_aligned(d->btf, type_id, data)) {
> - memcpy(&fl, data, sz);
> - flp = &fl;
> + memcpy(buf, data, sz);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could a malicious BTF bypass
size checks here by defining a FLOAT or PTR member with a bitfield size?
Looking at btf_dump_type_data_check_overflow(), it short-circuits the full
size bounds check against data_end when bit_sz != 0, checking only the
bitfield size:
if (bit_sz) {
__u8 nr_bytes = (bits_offset + bit_sz + 7) / 8;
return data + nr_bytes > d->typed_dump->data_end ? -E2BIG : nr_bytes;
}
However, we unconditionally read t->size bytes from data via memcpy
above, which could lead to an out-of-bounds heap read if the actual
data buffer is smaller than t->size.
> + flp = (void *)buf;
> }
>
> switch (sz) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this cause an unaligned memory
access crash on certain architectures when reading 16-byte floats?
ptr_is_aligned() checks alignment against the BTF target requirements,
which caps at 8 bytes. If the host architecture requires 16-byte
alignment for a 16-byte long double, and the data pointer is only
8-byte aligned, ptr_is_aligned() returns true and bypasses the local
buffer copy.
Later in the switch statement:
case 16:
btf_dump_type_values(d, "%Lf", flp->ld);
Casting that 8-byte aligned data pointer to union float_data and accessing
flp->ld could cause an unaligned memory access trap.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178229582410.80761.16669701451820050202@digiscrypt.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 7:54 [PATCH] libbpf: bounds-check float size in btf_dump_float_data() Naveed Khan
2026-06-23 8:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 8:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-23 20:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-24 10:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Naveed Khan
2026-06-24 10:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624102301.2B8401F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveed@digiscrypt.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox