BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] mm/slab: handle allow_spin in slab_free_hook() instead of open coding
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:24:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624132415.1C9391F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v1-2-fdf4d17351dd@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] slab_free_hook() proceeds with an unsafe GFP_NOWAIT allocation after VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!allow_spin) for SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU caches, deadlocking NMI callers.
--

commit b732dfb9de7b44943319ed866b71dd254fecb07a
Author: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>

mm/slab: handle allow_spin in slab_free_hook() instead of open coding

This commit refactors slab_free_hook() to accept an allow_spin parameter,
replacing the open-coded hook logic in memcg_alloc_abort_single() and
kfree_nolock(). It ensures that spinlock-acquiring free hooks and KASAN
quarantine operations are bypassed when allow_spin is false.

> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 32672a92581b0..85760c8ff2e29 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -2654,6 +2665,7 @@ bool slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x, bool init,
>  	if (still_accessible) {
>  		struct rcu_delayed_free *delayed_free;
>  
> +		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!allow_spin);
>  		delayed_free = kmalloc_obj(*delayed_free, GFP_NOWAIT);

[Severity: High]
If allow_spin is false (e.g., when called from kfree_nolock() in NMI or
atomic context), this triggers the warning but still proceeds to call
kmalloc_obj() with GFP_NOWAIT.

Since GFP_NOWAIT does not prevent the slab allocator from acquiring spinlocks
(such as pcp->lock or node->list_lock), and it does not strip
__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM which can wake kswapd and acquire scheduler locks, could
this lead to a deadlock if called in NMI context?

Should this path explicitly skip the allocation or return early when
allow_spin is false?

>  		if (delayed_free) {
>  			/*
>  			 * Let KASAN track our call stack as a "related work

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260624-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v1-0-fdf4d17351dd@kernel.org?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-24 13:11 [PATCH RFC 0/4] memcg,slab: kmalloc_nolock() fixes Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] mm/memcontrol: do not drain objcg stock when spinning is not allowed Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 13:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] mm/slab: handle allow_spin in slab_free_hook() instead of open coding Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 13:24   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm/slab: fix a deadlock in memcg_alloc_abort_single() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] mm/slab: serialize defer_free_barrier() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 13:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 16:30 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] memcg,slab: kmalloc_nolock() fixes Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-24 20:19   ` Harry Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260624132415.1C9391F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox