From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672B4367B62; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782401378; cv=none; b=RFt+Am2huw0mQnvakCV0ZEDpdPmXQ6Uk/VTj+jfkjicQBdSDexkr0p1B/3sudCKGgPpFtPu/vEZ0KjizF1O+T4ibjtHUw6kSfq2Qk+IdXszInMALpq7TLEduT9W1FYhbwzKEAxYRcZf35e4lqtOWrelHr2FX7T+eJCJFWDDOzp4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782401378; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w4J8LMxa47GaTafta8LeIflw8fTgvKf83WTxJtwwJz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Xy/vieTWh2cZHk0slPBid3br2Ve055xIODlxyRDWb56Nj3OSUztHxw/wL+ZH7RCBw/BO23f0Qxnb+REWrJhSkKfjtUZKmTzANqqwNzomJNWSR46IW27K0/OleaDHsyf1sJ8rNPQWuf4dik+Nc+eOouZ5IhhvP0IGWzPzSyhLjR4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JyjUgV6K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JyjUgV6K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8D391F00A3D; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:29:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782401376; bh=bs4Yn4Wfai7P6kGfbd32/Pz8JgxaNOwodkyvGYPv2uw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=JyjUgV6KrkzbIZnrM5fdUZ5eYa6GuthSNIk77fjYuN0bpLV68sCRKmwkD5strMGKR JyTXk14zp54DZp6/n60s6htkfmj7z8qr/H27RNUMvniDkFseADd0J6am2KvjwsC7V8 ofh/sPwq9qur+ka/ykbrAA0BVz3oVNYt4SLEQBL4IDpSSDw/rcUFnJ7i8jlf0LYRWE 2Y32kMIhwOHD4wsJzkLZ0q/wb0WZy3AnBjoAgOFQsPWbebutla3lwsm4UlP4c1O0yE ZZKxu466mQhV3bxu/UjlDNsIL6yNIcHKqGqp0dSn7tlcPsl2V3jXeizy3Qc92i5rFm r/WADWGOi+8jg== Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:29:36 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/xsk: preserve UMEM view in bidi test Message-ID: <20260625082936.3a44f8c6@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260623091008.1046547-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> <20260624193326.295e3711@kernel.org> <20260625073636.449a28c0@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 17:21:31 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 07:36:36AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:35:12 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 07:33:26PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > I have not checked if this has been -net propagated already, but the rule > > > of thumb on bpf side was that all selftests related effort goes to -next. > > > Is it different on netdev side? > > > > We prefer -next too, but during the merge window net-next is closed. > > > > What we definitely don't want is a -next patch with a Fixes tag. > > So either net or drop the tag, please. > > I have verified that offending commit is present in net tree. Could you > apply the v2 that I unfortunately sent already targeted at net-next, to > net tree? Will do. Hopefully it applies, cause net-next wasn't forwarded yet so it doesn't include Tushar's patches.