BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, jordan@jrife.io, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, emil@etsalapatis.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, horms@kernel.org,
	Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v10 4/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:03:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625110321.28236-5-mahe.tardy@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625110321.28236-1-mahe.tardy@gmail.com>

This test is similar to test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup but checks that,
in case of recursion, meaning that the BPF program calling the kfunc was
re-triggered by the icmp_send done by the kfunc, the kfunc will stop
early and return -EBUSY.

The test attaches to the root cgroup to ensure the ICMP packet generated
by the kfunc re-triggers the BPF program.

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c          | 46 ++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
index bbb3c3d4509c..bb532aa0d158 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/icmp_send_kfunc.c
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <network_helpers.h>
+#include <cgroup_helpers.h>
 #include <linux/errqueue.h>
 #include <poll.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
 #include "icmp_send.skel.h"

 #define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
@@ -10,6 +12,7 @@
 #define ICMP_DEST_UNREACH 3
 #define ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH 1

+#define ICMP_HOST_UNREACH 1
 #define ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED 4
 #define NR_ICMP_UNREACH 15
 #define ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE 6
@@ -195,3 +198,46 @@ void test_icmp_send_unreach_cgroup(void)
 	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
 		close(cgroup_fd);
 }
+
+void test_icmp_send_unreach_recursion(void)
+{
+	struct icmp_send *skel;
+	int cgroup_fd = -1;
+	int err;
+
+	err = setup_cgroup_environment();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setup_cgroup_environment"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = icmp_send__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	cgroup_fd = get_root_cgroup();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "get_root_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->data->target_pid = getpid();
+	skel->links.recursion =
+		bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.recursion, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.recursion, "prog_attach_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	trigger_prog_read_icmp_errqueue(skel, ICMP_HOST_UNREACH, AF_INET,
+					"127.0.0.1");
+
+	/*
+	 * Because there's recursion involved, the first call will return at
+	 * index 1 since it will return the second, and the second call will
+	 * return at index 0 since it will return the first.
+	 */
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->rec_count, 2, "rec_count");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->rec_kfunc_rets[0], -EBUSY, "kfunc_rets[0]");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->rec_kfunc_rets[1], 0, "kfunc_rets[1]");
+
+cleanup:
+	icmp_send__destroy(skel);
+	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
+		close(cgroup_fd);
+	cleanup_cgroup_environment();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
index 6e1ba539eeb0..c642ccdf9fd5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/icmp_send.c
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ __u16 server_port = 0;
 int unreach_type = 0;
 int unreach_code = 0;
 int kfunc_ret = -1;
+int target_pid = -1;
+
+unsigned int rec_count = 0;
+int rec_kfunc_rets[] = { -1, -1 };

 SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
 int egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
@@ -65,4 +69,55 @@ int egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	return SK_DROP;
 }

+SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
+int recursion(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
+	void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
+	struct icmphdr *icmph;
+	struct tcphdr *tcph;
+	struct iphdr *iph;
+	int ret;
+
+	if ((bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32) != target_pid)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	iph = data;
+	if ((void *)(iph + 1) > data_end || iph->version != 4)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	if (iph->daddr != bpf_htonl(SERVER_IP))
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP) {
+		tcph = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
+		if ((void *)(tcph + 1) > data_end ||
+		    tcph->dest != bpf_htons(server_port))
+			return SK_PASS;
+	} else if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) {
+		icmph = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
+		if ((void *)(icmph + 1) > data_end ||
+		    icmph->type != unreach_type || icmph->code != unreach_code)
+			return SK_PASS;
+	} else {
+		return SK_PASS;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * This call will provoke a recursion: the ICMP packet generated by the
+	 * kfunc will re-trigger this program since we are in the root cgroup in
+	 * which the kernel ICMP socket belongs. However when re-entering the
+	 * kfunc, it should return EBUSY.
+	 */
+	ret = bpf_icmp_send(skb, unreach_type, unreach_code);
+	rec_kfunc_rets[rec_count & 1] = ret;
+	__sync_fetch_and_add(&rec_count, 1);
+
+	/* Let the first ICMP error message pass */
+	if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	return SK_DROP;
+}
+
 char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "Dual BSD/GPL";
--
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-25 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-25 11:03 [PATCH bpf-next v10 0/5] bpf: add icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-06-25 11:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 1/5] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-06-25 16:24   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-06-25 16:49     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-06-25 11:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 2/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb tests Mahe Tardy
2026-06-25 11:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 3/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb IPv6 tests Mahe Tardy
2026-06-25 11:03 ` Mahe Tardy [this message]
2026-06-25 11:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 5/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send no route test Mahe Tardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260625110321.28236-5-mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
    --to=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jordan@jrife.io \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox