From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michal Luczaj" <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Fail unbound UDP on sockmap update
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 20:41:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626204125.C75961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626-sockmap-lookup-udp-leak-v2-4-7e7e201c951a@rbox.co>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Missing check for `socket()` failure leads to a false positive test pass.
--
commit 7f8484db13c3ae1f9676009ab7e283f2b68e4ae0
Author: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
selftests/bpf: Fail unbound UDP on sockmap update
This commit modifies test_maps to expect a failure when updating a sockmap
with an unbound UDP socket. It effectively reverts a previous selftests
change now that sockmap rejects unbound UDP sockets.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> @@ -759,12 +759,12 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
> goto out_sockmap;
> }
>
> - /* Test update with unsupported UDP socket */
> + /* Test update with unsupported unbound UDP socket */
> udp = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> i = 0;
> err = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &udp, BPF_ANY);
[Severity: Medium]
Will test_sockmap() in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c now silently
pass if socket() fails to create a file descriptor?
Because this patch changes the logic to expect an error from
bpf_map_update_elem() by checking if (!err), if socket() returns -1 due to
setup failures, bpf_map_update_elem() will fail with an error like -EBADF.
This would cause the test to erroneously pass without actually testing the
kernel's behavior for unbound UDP sockets. Does this test need a check to
ensure the returned udp file descriptor is valid before proceeding with the
map update?
> - if (err) {
> - printf("Failed socket update SOCK_DGRAM '%i:%i'\n",
> + if (!err) {
> + printf("Failed allowed unbound SOCK_DGRAM socket update '%i:%i'\n",
> i, udp);
> goto out_sockmap;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626-sockmap-lookup-udp-leak-v2-0-7e7e201c951a@rbox.co?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 20:36 [PATCH bpf v2 0/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix sockmap leaking UDP socks Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/4] bpf, sockmap: Reject unhashed UDP sockets on sockmap update Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:45 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-26 20:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-28 21:59 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-29 11:37 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-29 21:40 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-07-01 10:04 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-07-01 22:58 ` John Fastabend
2026-07-01 23:19 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-29 11:38 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-07-01 22:59 ` John Fastabend
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: Ensure UDP sockets are bound Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-28 21:58 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Adapt sockmap update error handling Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-28 21:58 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:58 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-28 21:59 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 21:14 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Fail unbound UDP on sockmap update Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-28 21:58 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 21:03 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 23:19 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-27 17:34 ` [PATCH bpf v2 0/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix sockmap leaking UDP socks sun jian
2026-06-28 22:00 ` Michal Luczaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260626204125.C75961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox