BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michal Luczaj" <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Fail unbound UDP on sockmap update
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 20:41:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626204125.C75961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626-sockmap-lookup-udp-leak-v2-4-7e7e201c951a@rbox.co>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Missing check for `socket()` failure leads to a false positive test pass.
--

commit 7f8484db13c3ae1f9676009ab7e283f2b68e4ae0
Author: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>

selftests/bpf: Fail unbound UDP on sockmap update

This commit modifies test_maps to expect a failure when updating a sockmap
with an unbound UDP socket. It effectively reverts a previous selftests
change now that sockmap rejects unbound UDP sockets.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> @@ -759,12 +759,12 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
>  		goto out_sockmap;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Test update with unsupported UDP socket */
> +	/* Test update with unsupported unbound UDP socket */
>  	udp = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>  	i = 0;
>  	err = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &udp, BPF_ANY);

[Severity: Medium]
Will test_sockmap() in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c now silently
pass if socket() fails to create a file descriptor?

Because this patch changes the logic to expect an error from
bpf_map_update_elem() by checking if (!err), if socket() returns -1 due to
setup failures, bpf_map_update_elem() will fail with an error like -EBADF.

This would cause the test to erroneously pass without actually testing the
kernel's behavior for unbound UDP sockets. Does this test need a check to
ensure the returned udp file descriptor is valid before proceeding with the
map update?

> -	if (err) {
> -		printf("Failed socket update SOCK_DGRAM '%i:%i'\n",
> +	if (!err) {
> +		printf("Failed allowed unbound SOCK_DGRAM socket update '%i:%i'\n",
>  		       i, udp);
>  		goto out_sockmap;
>  	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626-sockmap-lookup-udp-leak-v2-0-7e7e201c951a@rbox.co?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-26 20:36 [PATCH bpf v2 0/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix sockmap leaking UDP socks Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/4] bpf, sockmap: Reject unhashed UDP sockets on sockmap update Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:45   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-26 20:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-28 21:59     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-29 11:37       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-29 21:40         ` Michal Luczaj
2026-07-01 10:04           ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-07-01 22:58             ` John Fastabend
2026-07-01 23:19               ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-29 11:38   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-07-01 22:59     ` John Fastabend
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: Ensure UDP sockets are bound Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:47   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-28 21:58     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Adapt sockmap update error handling Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-28 21:58     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:58   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-28 21:59     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 21:14   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-26 20:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Fail unbound UDP on sockmap update Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 20:41   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-28 21:58     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-26 21:03   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 23:19     ` Michal Luczaj
2026-06-27 17:34 ` [PATCH bpf v2 0/4] bpf, sockmap: Fix sockmap leaking UDP socks sun jian
2026-06-28 22:00   ` Michal Luczaj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260626204125.C75961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox