From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5C133D3310; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782845165; cv=none; b=h3nSbIp9EsLZkZYWu00ko7MI+HdV8nAVVoUxMedswqTCZ3bsVhrunIH8LTnF14R8MGBanbzwSP0l1AS/ET58j6LbMIcCq4stiTnXTKQwjgmpbkAI9UGTmc8i8oWT/7nMR19zH4U+QIn+HLreymTbWrohQD8FE+1Frsf/LjgFiEg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782845165; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BpLQST7ZYpBBLqOMKyvL8YdlIfG12pwc37pkqYYsQwM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=AHrzk7THHTyjcc5z2QI+fhzI5sQjqSdhIReb92iUnQ50ENRfi/aqH2nVBfiiJT62pnvHB7AtAUCEyXmwyuqeQoUWsAqLOmbBzPr2mSoCAXLgCXz3grdxW7rXjrbvhAxMl39NmVTBJtQjiHEQjUHWZ2Qg/3OJ8GQlNqqTlVYA4bU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FWOl9KfH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FWOl9KfH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A7C01F000E9; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:46:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782845164; bh=BpLQST7ZYpBBLqOMKyvL8YdlIfG12pwc37pkqYYsQwM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=FWOl9KfHzs8T1h5ckzHE0TSvbwwBNv9BNCwoePQ2B+y+tlrGPE49X9YaYdaGDtYnP jbaZFlMfGj1Wuu7GPnD2BZ/V3SCA1u+qM/f3zXj2D0zOOryNkkXu/aSx+WmvL9T9aw 82fuwG5iVdId2IKpG9rn/XjfiZF2vnIDhACnmvFdCMkOmmqgVfvyzQW+kXX+nqmt3Y oFuNrl8JnQ0RZ/r6I+o6By4H2LhpPPXzLmV2W+126Onm5e5UOw+joXzvSjtBkQCRCb lz1uU9xxR0IMEF12jEN1v6VvQnFbL0nRD+qy3SSLIxcv0fwM6hfk8S75+/U1KWPxmY 1gsQBI02TL4Pg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/3] security: pass inode_init_security xattrs via struct lsm_xattrs Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "David Windsor" Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260630183956.281293-2-dwindsor@gmail.com> References: <20260630183956.281293-1-dwindsor@gmail.com> <20260630183956.281293-2-dwindsor@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:46:03 +0000 Message-Id: <20260630184603.9A7C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > inode_init_security receives the LSM xattr array and its count as > separate parameters. For better compatibility with the bpf verifier, > update inode_init_security and its callers to consolidate these > parameters into a single context object: struct lsm_xattrs. >=20 > Signed-off-by: David Windsor Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630183956.2812= 93-1-dwindsor@gmail.com?part=3D1