BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Khmelevskii <max@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] s390/bpf: Replace ly instruction with llgf
Date: Fri,  3 Jul 2026 14:51:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703125648.919196-4-max@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Sashiko found a bug [1] in 9012cf2491e3, where upper bits of a 64-bit
register are not zero-extended after ly instruction in used.

Tested:
  ./test_progs -v -t get_smp_processor_id

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260414142930.528751-1-max%40linux.ibm.com

Maxim Khmelevskii (2):
  s390/bpf: Replace ly instruction with llgf
  selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_smp_processor_id

 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                  |  4 +-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/get_smp_processor_id.c     | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/get_smp_processor_id.c          | 20 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_smp_processor_id.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_smp_processor_id.c

-- 
2.54.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-03 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03 12:51 Maxim Khmelevskii [this message]
2026-07-03 12:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] s390/bpf: Replace ly instruction with llgf Maxim Khmelevskii
2026-07-03 12:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_smp_processor_id Maxim Khmelevskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260703125648.919196-4-max@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=max@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox