BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ziyang Men" <ziyang.meme@gmail.com>
Cc: mkoutny@suse.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/bpf: add memcg_stat_churn_percpu BPF-vs-memory.stat benchmark under cross-CPU churn
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 05:04:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260704050429.328271F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260704045617.487664-4-ziyang.meme@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Forked long-running child processes lack a parent-death signal, leading to runaway CPU-bound orphans if the test runner is forcefully terminated.
--

commit 0078545540e155786a22dbc2aaffa44f31944e3b
Author: Ziyang Men <ziyang.meme@gmail.com>

selftests/bpf: add memcg_stat_churn_percpu BPF-vs-memory.stat benchmark under cross-CPU churn

This commit introduces a new test_progs benchmark to evaluate memory-cgroup
statistics reading under cross-CPU churn. It forks multiple churner child
processes that migrate across CPUs and constantly allocate and free memory.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/memcg_stat_churn_percpu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/memcg_stat_churn_percpu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..16c3f261c8780
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/memcg_stat_churn_percpu.c

[ ... ]

> +static void churner_child(const struct cg_node *leaf, int base, int k,
> +			  size_t region_bytes, size_t resident_bytes)
> +{
> +	int c_pool = n_cpu - n_reserved;
> +	void *resident;
> +	int j = 0;

[ ... ]

> +	if (write(churn_ready[1], "x", 1) != 1)
> +		_exit(3);
> +	close(churn_ready[1]);	/* so a sibling's early death yields EOF, not a parent hang */
> +
> +	while (!ctl->stop) {
> +		void *p;
> +
> +		/* migrate to the next of our K CPUs, then dirty the leaf there */

[Severity: Medium]
Will these child processes run indefinitely as CPU-bound orphans if the test
runner is abruptly terminated?

Since the loop relies on the parent safely executing the cleanup path to set
ctl->stop = 1, a hard crash or a timeout (like a SIGKILL from a CI system)
could leave these processes running forever.

Would it make sense to call prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL) early in this
function so the kernel automatically cleans them up if the parent dies?

> +		pin_cpu(cpu_list[n_reserved + (base + j) % c_pool]);
> +		if (++j == k)
> +			j = 0;
> +
> +		p = mmap(NULL, region_bytes, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> +			 MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260704045617.487664-1-ziyang.meme@gmail.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-04  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-04  4:56 [PATCH 0/3] selftests/bpf: compare BPF and memory.stat memcg stat readers Ziyang Men
2026-07-04  4:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/bpf: add memcg_stat_reader BPF-vs-memory.stat benchmark Ziyang Men
2026-07-04  5:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04  4:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/bpf: add memcg_stat_churn BPF-vs-memory.stat benchmark under churn Ziyang Men
2026-07-04  5:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-04  4:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/bpf: add memcg_stat_churn_percpu BPF-vs-memory.stat benchmark under cross-CPU churn Ziyang Men
2026-07-04  5:04   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-04  5:58   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-07  0:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] selftests/bpf: compare BPF and memory.stat memcg stat readers Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-07  1:50   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260704050429.328271F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziyang.meme@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox