From: Maxim Khmelevskii <max@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Skip res_spin_lock_stress if no perf support
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:47:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708104729.1248234-2-max@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Probe PMU support before loading bpf_test_rqspinlock.ko,
otherwise the test fails with not obvious error without
proper perf event support:
Failed to load bpf_test_rqspinlock.ko into the kernel: -2
serial_test_res_spin_lock_stress:FAIL:load module AA
unexpected error: -22 (errno 2)
Reported-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Khmelevskii <max@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c
index f0a8c828f8f1..7541f4966abc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#include <network_helpers.h>
#include <sys/sysinfo.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include "res_spin_lock.skel.h"
#include "res_spin_lock_fail.skel.h"
@@ -102,11 +104,29 @@ void test_res_spin_lock_success(void)
void serial_test_res_spin_lock_stress(void)
{
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+ .size = sizeof(attr),
+ .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+ .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+ };
+ int pmu_fd;
+
if (libbpf_num_possible_cpus() < 3) {
test__skip();
return;
}
+ pmu_fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
+ if (pmu_fd < 0) {
+ if (errno == ENOENT || errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+ ASSERT_OK(-errno, "perf_event_open pmu probe");
+ return;
+ }
+ close(pmu_fd);
+
ASSERT_OK(load_module("bpf_test_rqspinlock.ko", false), "load module AA");
sleep(5);
unload_module("bpf_test_rqspinlock", false);
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 10:47 Maxim Khmelevskii [this message]
2026-07-08 20:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Skip res_spin_lock_stress if no perf support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708104729.1248234-2-max@linux.ibm.com \
--to=max@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox