From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 23:16:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709231615.0519D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709230242.2003459-5-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uninitialized stack memory read in `check_kfunc_call` when handling kfunc calls in signed BPF programs.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta ---
commit b1105689a4b2bf6e2532e6d414d410ef55c0694b
Author: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta
Helper and kfunc argument checking carried two separate meta structs: the
verifier-local struct bpf_call_arg_meta and bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta.
Merge them into a single struct bpf_call_arg_meta. This is groundwork for
sharing argument checking between helpers and kfuncs.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index fcd9715eff017..5ccb00a8c84ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -12972,7 +12953,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
> const char *func_name, *ptr_type_name;
> const struct btf_type *t, *ptr_type;
> - struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta meta;
> + struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta;
> struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux;
> int err, insn_idx = *insn_idx_p;
> const struct btf_param *args;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this lead to reading an uninitialized
pointer if bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta() returns early?
In check_kfunc_call() in kernel/bpf/verifier.c, the local variable meta is
declared without initialization and passed to bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta().
If the call to fetch_kfunc_meta() inside it returns an error like -EACCES,
it returns early before initializing meta:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta() {
struct bpf_kfunc_meta kfunc;
int err;
err = fetch_kfunc_meta(env, func_id, offset, &kfunc);
if (err)
return err;
...
}
Back in check_kfunc_call(), the error path evaluates meta.func_name:
err = bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta(env, insn->imm, insn->off, &meta);
if (err == -EACCES && meta.func_name)
verbose(env, "calling kernel function %s is not allowed\n", meta.func_name);
If the stack memory is uninitialized, could meta.func_name contain a garbage
pointer that leads to a crash or an info leak when dereferenced by vsnprintf
during the verbose() call?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709230242.2003459-1-ameryhung@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 23:02 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/4] Unify helper and kfunc call_arg_meta Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/4] bpf: Remove dynptr check in check_stack_range_initialized() Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/4] bpf: Factor out raw_mode-related fields in bpf_call_arg_meta Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 23:36 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc allocation-size argument handling Amery Hung
2026-07-10 0:02 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 23:44 ` Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709231615.0519D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox