BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 23:16:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709231615.0519D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709230242.2003459-5-ameryhung@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uninitialized stack memory read in `check_kfunc_call` when handling kfunc calls in signed BPF programs.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta ---
commit b1105689a4b2bf6e2532e6d414d410ef55c0694b
Author: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>

bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta
    
Helper and kfunc argument checking carried two separate meta structs: the
verifier-local struct bpf_call_arg_meta and bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta.
Merge them into a single struct bpf_call_arg_meta. This is groundwork for
sharing argument checking between helpers and kfuncs.

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index fcd9715eff017..5ccb00a8c84ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -12972,7 +12953,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
>  	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
>  	const char *func_name, *ptr_type_name;
>  	const struct btf_type *t, *ptr_type;
> -	struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta meta;
> +	struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta;
>  	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux;
>  	int err, insn_idx = *insn_idx_p;
>  	const struct btf_param *args;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this lead to reading an uninitialized
pointer if bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta() returns early?

In check_kfunc_call() in kernel/bpf/verifier.c, the local variable meta is
declared without initialization and passed to bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta().
If the call to fetch_kfunc_meta() inside it returns an error like -EACCES,
it returns early before initializing meta:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta() {
	struct bpf_kfunc_meta kfunc;
	int err;

	err = fetch_kfunc_meta(env, func_id, offset, &kfunc);
	if (err)
		return err;
    ...
}

Back in check_kfunc_call(), the error path evaluates meta.func_name:

	err = bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta(env, insn->imm, insn->off, &meta);
	if (err == -EACCES && meta.func_name)
		verbose(env, "calling kernel function %s is not allowed\n", meta.func_name);

If the stack memory is uninitialized, could meta.func_name contain a garbage
pointer that leads to a crash or an info leak when dereferenced by vsnprintf
during the verbose() call?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709230242.2003459-1-ameryhung@gmail.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 23:02 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/4] Unify helper and kfunc call_arg_meta Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/4] bpf: Remove dynptr check in check_stack_range_initialized() Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/4] bpf: Factor out raw_mode-related fields in bpf_call_arg_meta Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 23:36     ` Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc allocation-size argument handling Amery Hung
2026-07-10  0:02   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-09 23:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta Amery Hung
2026-07-09 23:16   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 23:44     ` Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709231615.0519D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox