From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 07:00:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715070056.6B8451F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715064047.1793790-8-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uninitialized stack variable `meta.func_name` dereferenced on error path, leading to kernel panic.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta ---
commit ca91a3b2fc7adc980912af895a2a5840eb94b51f
Author: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta
This commit merges bpf_call_arg_meta and bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta into a single
struct. The unused btf_id field is dropped from the helper meta as groundwork
for sharing argument checking logic.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -12953,11 +12953,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
> const char *func_name, *ptr_type_name;
> const struct btf_type *t, *ptr_type;
> - struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta meta;
> + struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta;
> struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux;
> int err, insn_idx = *insn_idx_p;
> const struct btf_param *args;
[ ... ]
> /* skip for now, but return error when we find this in fixup_kfunc_call */
> if (!insn->imm)
> return 0;
>
> err = bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta(env, insn->imm, insn->off, &meta);
> if (err == -EACCES && meta.func_name)
> verbose(env, "calling kernel function %s is not allowed\n", meta.func_name);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path dereference an
uninitialized stack variable?
Looking at bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta() in kernel/bpf/verifier.c, if
fetch_kfunc_meta() returns an error like -EACCES, it returns early without
initializing the struct:
int bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta(...)
{
...
err = fetch_kfunc_meta(env, func_id, offset, &kfunc);
if (err)
return err;
memset(meta, 0, sizeof(*meta));
...
}
When this early return happens, the meta struct on the stack in
check_kfunc_call() remains uninitialized. The check here for
err == -EACCES && meta.func_name will then evaluate garbage memory for
meta.func_name.
If the uninitialized memory evaluates to true, verbose() will dereference
that garbage pointer, which could lead to a kernel panic. Could we initialize
the meta struct earlier, or zero it in check_kfunc_call() before passing it?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715064047.1793790-1-ameryhung@gmail.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 6:40 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Unify helper and kfunc call_arg_meta Amery Hung
2026-07-15 6:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] bpf: Remove dynptr check in check_stack_range_initialized() Amery Hung
2026-07-15 6:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: Factor out raw_mode-related fields in bpf_call_arg_meta Amery Hung
2026-07-15 7:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 7:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-15 6:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf: Pass argno to callees in check_func_arg() instead of argno_from_reg(regno) Amery Hung
2026-07-15 6:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc allocation-size argument handling Amery Hung
2026-07-15 6:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/7] selftests/bpf: Test kfunc returning zero-sized allocation buffer Amery Hung
2026-07-15 6:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/7] bpf: Drop redundant pkt_access from bpf_call_arg_meta Amery Hung
2026-07-15 6:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc call argument meta Amery Hung
2026-07-15 7:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 9:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Unify helper and kfunc call_arg_meta patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715070056.6B8451F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox