From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] net: ice: add xmo_rx_checksum callback
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:48:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715214801.AB7221F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715-bpf-xdp-meta-rxcksum-v5-3-623d5c0d0ab7@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `ice_xdp_rx_checksum()` XDP metadata getter calls `ice_get_rx_csum()`, which has side effects that artificially inflate hardware error statistics and cause double-counting.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] net: ice: add xmo_rx_checksum callback ---
commit 741cd60a0647d5876e42a8815bc6526c4da474e1
Author: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
net: ice: add xmo_rx_checksum callback
This patch implements the xmo_rx_checksum callback in the ice driver to report
RX checksum results to eBPF programs. It introduces the ice_get_rx_csum utility
routine to make the RX checksum code reusable from both ice_rx_csum() and
ice_xdp_rx_checksum().
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c
> index e695a664e53d1..3aa82ff03d9e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c
[ ... ]
> static void
> -ice_rx_csum(struct ice_rx_ring *ring, struct sk_buff *skb,
> - union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *rx_desc, u16 ptype)
> +ice_get_rx_csum(const union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *rx_desc, u16 ptype,
> + struct ice_rx_ring *ring, enum xdp_checksum *ip_summed,
> + u32 *cksum, u8 *cksum_level)
> {
[ ... ]
> if (ipv4 && (rx_status0 & (BIT(ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_XSUM_EIPE_S)))) {
> ring->vsi->back->hw_rx_eipe_error++;
> - return;
> + goto checksum_none;
> }
[ ... ]
> checksum_fail:
> ring->vsi->back->hw_csum_rx_error++;
> +checksum_none:
> + *ip_summed = XDP_CHECKSUM_NONE;
> + *cksum_level = 0;
> + *cksum = 0;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static int ice_xdp_rx_checksum(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> + enum xdp_checksum *ip_summed,
> + u32 *cksum, u8 *cksum_level)
> +{
> + const struct libeth_xdp_buff *xdp_ext = (void *)ctx;
> + const union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *rx_desc = xdp_ext->desc;
> + struct ice_rx_ring *ring;
> +
> + ring = libeth_xdp_buff_to_rq(xdp_ext, typeof(*ring), xdp_rxq);
> + ice_get_rx_csum(rx_desc, ice_get_ptype(rx_desc), ring, ip_summed,
> + cksum, cksum_level);
[Severity: Medium]
Since ice_get_rx_csum() increments hw_rx_eipe_error and hw_csum_rx_error, does
calling it from the XDP metadata getter artificially inflate these statistics?
An eBPF program can call the metadata getter multiple times on a single packet,
which would cause multi-counting. Furthermore, if the program returns XDP_PASS,
the networking stack will process the packet and call ice_rx_csum() which
calls ice_get_rx_csum() again, resulting in double-counting for the error.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715-bpf-xdp-meta-rxcksum-v5-0-623d5c0d0ab7@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 21:39 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/8] Add the the capability to load HW RX checksum in eBPF programs Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/8] netlink: specs: add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 22:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/8] net: veth: add xmo_rx_checksum callback to veth driver Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 22:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] net: ice: add xmo_rx_checksum callback Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 21:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/8] selftests/bpf: add selftest support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/8] selftests/bpf: add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/8] net: add bpf_skb_rx_checksum kfunc to read skb checksum metadata Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_skb_rx_checksum kfunc Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 22:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/8] selftests: net: add test for XDP_PASS skb checksum invalidation Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-15 21:58 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715214801.AB7221F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox