BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:17:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717141737.4090962-1-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)

save_args() reads stack-passed arguments relative to FP assuming the
trampoline is entered through the fentry call from a traced function, in
which case both the parent frame (FP/x9) and the traced function frame
(FP/LR) are saved before FP is set, so the arguments start at FP + 32.

An indirect trampoline for a struct_ops callback is entered through a
function pointer (blr), so only the FP/LR frame is pushed and the
arguments start at FP + 16, not FP + 32. Every stack-passed argument of
a struct_ops callback with more than eight argument slots is read two
slots off.

This has gone unnoticed because no in-tree struct_ops member passes
arguments on the stack. Pass is_struct_ops into save_args() and pick the
offset accordingly, mirroring the x86 fix.

Fixes: 9014cf56f13d ("bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments")
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index c6756b964c843..4fe235f7ce894 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ static void clear_garbage(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int reg, int effective_bytes)
 static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
 		      const struct btf_func_model *m,
 		      const struct arg_aux *a,
-		      bool for_call_origin)
+		      bool for_call_origin, bool is_struct_ops)
 {
 	int i;
 	int reg;
@@ -2526,7 +2526,15 @@ static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int bargs_off, int oargs_off,
 		bargs_off += 8;
 	}
 
-	soff = 32; /* on stack arguments start from FP + 32 */
+	/*
+	 * On-stack arguments start above the frame(s) pushed by the
+	 * trampoline prologue. A traced function is entered through the
+	 * fentry call, so both the parent (FP/x9) and the traced function
+	 * (FP/LR) frames are saved and the arguments start at FP + 32. A
+	 * struct_ops callback is called indirectly, so only the FP/LR frame
+	 * is saved and the arguments start at FP + 16.
+	 */
+	soff = is_struct_ops ? 16 : 32;
 	doff = (for_call_origin ? oargs_off : bargs_off);
 
 	/* save on stack arguments */
@@ -2722,7 +2730,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	store_func_meta(ctx, func_meta, func_meta_off);
 
 	/* save args for bpf */
-	save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false);
+	save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, false, is_struct_ops);
 
 	/* save callee saved registers */
 	emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(19), A64_SP, regs_off), ctx);
@@ -2771,7 +2779,7 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
 		/* save args for original func */
-		save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true);
+		save_args(ctx, bargs_off, oargs_off, m, a, true, is_struct_ops);
 		/* call original func */
 		emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, retaddr_off), ctx);
 		emit(A64_ADR(A64_LR, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE * 2), ctx);

base-commit: 1d91ea01185656ac3ee63c5f9f6f8bde3c746b3d
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 14:17 Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2026-07-17 14:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-18  2:49 ` Xu Kuohai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717141737.4090962-1-puranjay@kernel.org \
    --to=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox