BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Felix Fietkau" <nbd@nbd.name>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Fix alignment of memory allocator objects on 32-bit archs
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:16:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717191656.F17B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717183632.99195-1-nbd@nbd.name>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] On 32-bit architectures, the verifier's hardcoded 8-byte load (BPF_DW) for bpf_this_cpu_ptr()/bpf_per_cpu_ptr() causes a KASAN out-of-bounds read past the 4-byte percpu pointer and passes garbage data on Big Endian systems.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] bpf: Fix alignment of memory allocator objects on 32-bit archs ---
commit ed5f9ae93bc0fc6463cab51b598b3ca3395812da
Author: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>

bpf: Fix alignment of memory allocator objects on 32-bit archs

The BPF memory allocator prefixes each object with a header. On 32-bit
architectures, the memory handed out was offset by 4 bytes. This patch pads
the header to 8 bytes to preserve alignment and updates the percpu pointer
offset accordingly.

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
> index e9662db7198fe..ca7555b1da34f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node, gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	if (c->percpu_size) {
> -		void __percpu **obj = kmalloc_node(c->percpu_size, flags, node);
> +		void *obj = kmalloc_node(c->percpu_size, flags, node);
>  		void __percpu *pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(c->unit_size, 8, flags);
>  
>  		if (!obj || !pptr) {
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node, gfp_t flags)
>  			kfree(obj);
>  			return NULL;
>  		}
> -		obj[1] = pptr;
> +		*(void __percpu **)(obj + LLIST_NODE_SZ) = pptr;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this 32-bit pointer write lead to an
out-of-bounds read when accessed by the verifier?

On 32-bit systems, the allocation size for percpu objects is typically 12
bytes (LLIST_NODE_SZ + sizeof(void *)). The percpu pointer is stored at offset
8 using a 32-bit store.

However, the verifier unconditionally patches bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and
bpf_this_cpu_ptr() to read this pointer using an 8-byte load:

kernel/bpf/fixups.c:fixup_bpf_calls() {
    ...
    insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0);
    ...
}

Could this 64-bit read access bytes 8-15 of the 12-byte allocation, causing a
KASAN slab-out-of-bounds read?

Furthermore, on 32-bit Big Endian systems, does this 8-byte load place the
4-byte pointer into the upper 32 bits and the out-of-bounds garbage into the
lower 32 bits, leading to memory corruption or a kernel panic when the garbage
is later dereferenced?

>  		return obj;
>  	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717183632.99195-1-nbd@nbd.name?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 18:36 [PATCH] bpf: Fix alignment of memory allocator objects on 32-bit archs Felix Fietkau
2026-07-17 19:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717191656.F17B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox