BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pu Lehui" <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] e1000e: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO access by validating BAR0 size
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:52:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720135218.92EE61F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720133049.1289167-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver unconditionally maps BAR0 with `ioremap()`, without verifying that BAR0 is an `IORESOURCE_MEM` region. A spoofed PCI device could expose BAR0 as an I/O region, which could bypass the new length check on some architectures and lead to `ioremap()` being called on an I/O port address.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net v2] e1000e: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO access by validating BAR0 size ---
commit 939eee77005bb32587689d8e06aa2cec8c38f7e9
Author: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

e1000e: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO access by validating BAR0 size

This commit fixes an out-of-bounds MMIO access in the e1000e driver
by ensuring the length of BAR0 is at least 64K before performing ioremap.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 844f31ab37ad4..46e58e926f7b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -7450,6 +7450,11 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  	mmio_len = pci_resource_len(pdev, 0);
>  
>  	err = -EIO;
> +	if (mmio_len < E1000_MMIO_LEN_MIN) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MMIO len is too small\n");
> +		goto err_ioremap;
> +	}
> +
>  	adapter->hw.hw_addr = ioremap(mmio_start, mmio_len);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is it possible for ioremap() 
to be called on an I/O port region here?

Earlier in e1000_probe(), pci_select_bars() filters out non-memory BARs. If 
a device is bound via sysfs and exposes BAR0 as an IORESOURCE_IO region 
instead of IORESOURCE_MEM, the driver fails to request the region but still 
unconditionally passes mmio_start to ioremap() at this location.

Could this cause a kernel panic on architectures where I/O space is distinct 
from memory space when the returned address is subsequently dereferenced?

>  	if (!adapter->hw.hw_addr)
>  		goto err_ioremap;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720133049.1289167-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 13:30 [PATCH net v2] e1000e: Fix out-of-bounds MMIO access by validating BAR0 size Pu Lehui
2026-07-20 13:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-20 14:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-07-21  2:06   ` Pu Lehui
2026-07-21 13:02     ` Andrew Lunn
2026-07-22  2:19       ` Pu Lehui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720135218.92EE61F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox