From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/18] bpf: Classify kfunc mem_size args from BTF without register state
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:38:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724193854.57F981F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724190813.1458271-12-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Removing the `SCALAR_VALUE` check from `is_kfunc_arg_mem_size()` and `is_kfunc_arg_const_mem_size()` allows unvalidated pointer registers to be passed as memory size arguments during kfunc lookahead validation, triggering a `verifier_bug` kernel warning splat and local DoS.
--
--- Patch [11]: [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/18] bpf: Classify kfunc mem_size args from BTF without register state ---
commit 55013229ec44003dda12328783652d410aa4f75e
Author: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
bpf: Classify kfunc mem_size args from BTF without register state
This commit drops the scalar register type check in is_kfunc_arg_mem_size()
and is_kfunc_arg_const_mem_size() to decouple get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type()
from register state.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 0f8d403083177..f6b373630ca95 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -10795,26 +10795,24 @@ static bool is_kfunc_rcu_protected(struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
> }
>
> static bool is_kfunc_arg_mem_size(const struct btf *btf,
> - const struct btf_param *arg,
> - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
> + const struct btf_param *arg)
> {
> const struct btf_type *t;
>
> t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, arg->type, NULL);
> - if (!btf_type_is_scalar(t) || reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE)
> + if (!btf_type_is_scalar(t))
> return false;
>
> return btf_param_match_suffix(btf, arg, "__sz");
> }
[Severity: High]
Could this removal allow a pointer register to be incorrectly classified as a
memory size parameter during kfunc lookahead validation?
If a BPF program passes a pointer register (such as PTR_TO_STACK with a fixed
offset of 0) instead of a scalar to a size argument suffixed with __sz,
get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type() will now look ahead and classify it solely based on
the BTF signature.
Because of this classification, check_kfunc_args() eagerly processes the
unverified register as a size parameter before the generic scalar validation
loop catches it:
check_kfunc_args()
...
check_mem_size_reg(env, buff_reg, size_reg, argno, next_argno, ...)
Inside check_mem_size_reg(), the pointer with a fixed offset of 0 yields a
size of 0. Since zero-size is allowed, it passes the bounds check and calls
mark_chain_precision() on the pointer register.
Because mark_chain_precision() expects a SCALAR_VALUE, it triggers a
verifier_bug splat for backtracking misuse when given a pointer. On systems
configured with panic_on_warn, this creates a local denial of service
regression.
Should the register type check be retained here, or is there another way to
prevent pointer registers from bypassing validation during the lookahead?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260724190813.1458271-1-ameryhung@gmail.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 19:07 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/18] Generate bpf_func_proto for kfunc Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/18] bpf: Drop process_timer_func wrappers Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/18] bpf: Unify const map ptr argument checking for helpers and kfuncs Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 20:49 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-24 21:29 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-24 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/18] bpf: Split kfunc map argument into __const_map and __map Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/18] bpf: Pass kfunc meta to mem and mem_size check Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/18] bpf: Check helper and kfunc mem+size arguments identically Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/18] selftests/bpf: Add tests for helper and kfunc mem+size arguments Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/18] bpf: Check fixed-size mem args of helpers and kfuncs the same way Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 20:39 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/18] bpf: Express ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO as ARG_CONST_SIZE | SCALAR_MAYBE_ZERO Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/18] bpf: Rename ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} to ARG_MEM_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/18] bpf: Fold __szk const size handling into the scalar arg path Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/18] bpf: Classify kfunc mem_size args from BTF without register state Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-24 22:52 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/18] bpf: Handle NULL kfunc pointer args without a KF_ARG_PTR_TO_NULL type Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/18] bpf: Distinguish fixed- and variable-size kfunc mem args with MEM_FIXED_SIZE Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/18] bpf: Check helper mem+size in ARG_PTR_TO_MEM case Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 21:10 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/18] bpf: Classify kfunc pointer arguments from BTF, resolve type against the register Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/18] bpf: Tag nullable kfunc pointer args with PTR_MAYBE_NULL Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/18] bpf: Classify scalar kfunc arguments from BTF Amery Hung
2026-07-24 19:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/18] bpf: Generate kfunc argument prototype at add-call time Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724193854.57F981F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox