BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pu Lehui" <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 8/9] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:57:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260725155706.54C5C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260725154915.2488611-9-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] bpf_jit_free() ignores the error return value of bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(), leading to a Use-After-Free and Double Free of the JIT ro_header.
--

--- Patch [8]: [PATCH bpf-next v3 8/9] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free ---
commit a0a806deebfc4afdceb1a23fa093826ade44c8cf
Author: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free

When CFI is enabled, the actual BPF program entry point is shifted forward
by a CFI preamble. This commit subtracts the CFI offset from prog->bpf_func
in bpf_jit_free() to restore the original JITed allocation address before
freeing it, preventing an invalid memory free.

> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> index cbfcd287ea166..059db1adeaf8d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  			kvfree(jit_data->ctx.offset);
>  			kfree(jit_data);
>  		}
> +		prog->bpf_func = (void *)prog->bpf_func - cfi_get_offset();
>  		hdr = bpf_jit_binary_pack_hdr(prog);
>  		bpf_jit_binary_pack_free(hdr, NULL);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does ignoring the return value of
bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() (called just prior to this diff snippet)
lead to a use-after-free and double free?

If bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() fails, it frees ro_header internally:

kernel/bpf/core.c:bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() {
    ...
    if (IS_ERR(ptr)) {
        bpf_prog_pack_free(ro_header, ro_header->size);
        return PTR_ERR(ptr);
    }
    ...
}

Back in bpf_jit_free(), we ignore this failure, extract the same freed
header via bpf_jit_binary_pack_hdr(), and call bpf_jit_binary_pack_free()
which dereferences ro_header->size and frees it again:

kernel/bpf/core.c:bpf_jit_binary_pack_free() {
    u32 size = ro_header->size;

    bpf_prog_pack_free(ro_header, size);
    ...
}

Should bpf_jit_free() check if bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() returned
an error before attempting to extract and free the header again?

>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off(prog));

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260725154915.2488611-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-25 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-25 15:49 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/9] Fixes for bpf_jit_free Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/9] bpf: Extract the bpf_jit_binary_hdr helper Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/9] s390/bpf: Fix memory leak in bpf_jit_free Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/9] parisc: " Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/9] bpf, sparc64: " Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/9] ARC, bpf: " Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/9] bpf, arm64: " Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 16:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/9] bpf, arm64: Fix private stack leak when JIT failed Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 8/9] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free Pu Lehui
2026-07-25 15:57   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-25 15:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 9/9] bpf: Fix double-free RO header " Pu Lehui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260725155706.54C5C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox