From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/6] xsk: require at least 16 bytes of TX metadata
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:20:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728162044.1D70B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727161959.885642-2-sdf@fomichev.me>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Incomplete Fix / Out-of-Bounds Memory Read in TX Metadata
- [High] UAPI ABI Incompatibility between 32-bit and 64-bit architectures
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net 1/6] xsk: require at least 16 bytes of TX metadata ---
commit 8f587b21f2b30dd32c9e63e0817476297538dfb0
Author: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
xsk: require at least 16 bytes of TX metadata
AF_XDP accepts a TX metadata length as small as eight bytes. This commit
requires a minimum of 16 bytes of TX metadata to preserve compatibility with
applications that do not use launch-time metadata while addressing
out-of-bounds reads.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260720155210.34229-1-blbllhy@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> index 58da2f4f4397a..cd8643360eb3a 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
> if (mr->flags & XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN) {
> if (mr->tx_metadata_len >= 256 || mr->tx_metadata_len % 8)
> return -EINVAL;
> + if (mr->tx_metadata_len < 16)
> + return -EINVAL;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is a 16-byte minimum sufficient when the
launch_time flag is requested?
If a userspace application sets XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_LAUNCH_TIME in the metadata
flags and provides a tx_metadata_len of 16, it appears we can still read out
of bounds. In include/net/xdp_sock.h:xsk_tx_metadata_request(), the code
reads the 8-byte launch_time field at offset 16 when the flag is set:
include/net/xdp_sock.h:xsk_tx_metadata_request() {
...
ops->tmo_request_launch_time(meta->request.launch_time, priv);
...
}
If the descriptor addr is placed at the very end of the registered umem (for
example, desc->addr = umem_size - 1 with len = 1), reading 8 bytes at offset
16 extends beyond the umem bounds. Since xp_aligned_validate_desc() validates
based on the chunk, does this allow reading into potentially unmapped memory
if the launch_time flag is set?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this tx_metadata_len
validation correctly handle 32-bit applications running on a 64-bit kernel?
Looking at struct xsk_tx_metadata in include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h, there is no
explicit padding between csum_offset and launch_time:
include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h:struct xsk_tx_metadata {
__u64 flags;
union {
struct {
__u16 csum_start;
__u16 csum_offset;
__u64 launch_time;
} request;
...
};
};
On 32-bit x86, __u64 has a 4-byte alignment, which places launch_time at
offset 12 and makes the total structure size 20 bytes. On a 64-bit kernel,
__u64 is 8-byte aligned, placing launch_time at offset 16 with a 24-byte
structure size.
If a 32-bit application registers a 20-byte length, it would be rejected by
the tx_metadata_len % 8 check above. If it registers 24 bytes but populates
launch_time at its native offset 12, would the 64-bit kernel read unexpected
data from offset 16?
> umem->tx_metadata_len = mr->tx_metadata_len;
> }
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727161959.885642-1-sdf@fomichev.me?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 16:19 [PATCH net 0/6] xsk: harden TX metadata validation against races Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 1/6] xsk: require at least 16 bytes of TX metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-28 16:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-29 15:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 2/6] xsk: pass TX metadata pointer by reference Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-28 16:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:59 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 3/6] xsk: clear metadata pointer when no timestamp is requested Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-28 16:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 16:03 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 4/6] xsk: validate launch-time metadata size Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-28 16:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 16:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 5/6] xsk: move xsk_tx_metadata_request() to xdp_sock_drv.h Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-27 16:19 ` [PATCH net 6/6] xsk: validate metadata when processing requests Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-28 16:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-29 9:39 ` [PATCH net 0/6] xsk: harden TX metadata validation against races Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-29 16:08 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728162044.1D70B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox