From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 1/1] tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:49:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731114930.DEF531F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730114919.658373-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] tcp_tso_autosize is not exported as a BPF kfunc, making it impossible for custom BPF CC programs to utilize standard TSO autosizing.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v6 net-next 1/1] tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback ---
commit e9e6269217c20aef163ee8ebfb7cab71f918807f
Author: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback
This patch replaces the existing min_tso_segs() CC callback with a new
tso_segs() callback. The new callback provides the explicit TSO segment
number for each data burst, completely bypassing tcp_tso_autosize().
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index d7c1444b5e304..d9bda3a84f261 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2269,6 +2269,7 @@ static u32 tcp_tso_autosize(const struct sock *sk, unsigned int mss_now,
>
> return max_t(u32, bytes / mss_now, min_tso_segs);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_tso_autosize);
[Severity: High]
Since BPF congestion control programs now need to compute the final TSO
segments value, do they need access to tcp_tso_autosize() to retain standard
autosizing?
The commit exports tcp_tso_autosize for native kernel modules, but it appears
missing from the BTF kfuncs set (bpf_tcp_ca_check_kfunc_ids) in
net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c:
BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_tcp_ca_check_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, tcp_reno_ssthresh)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, tcp_reno_cong_avoid)
...
BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_tcp_ca_check_kfunc_ids)
Without being registered here, custom BPF CC programs cannot call
tcp_tso_autosize(). This might prevent them from properly migrating to the
new tso_segs callback if they want to retain standard TSO autosizing.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730114919.658373-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 11:49 [PATCH v6 net-next 1/1] tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback chia-yu.chang
2026-07-31 11:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731114930.DEF531F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).