From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejas Birajdar" <tejasbirajdar@meta.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] tcp: honor BPF_SOCK_OPS_RWND_INIT on the active connect path
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:01:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731220124.B0C621F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730220055.2946171-1-tejasbirajdar@meta.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] The `SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK` check executes before the BPF program runs and before `full_space` is inflated, silently defeating BPF-requested windows and bypassing dynamic `SO_RCVBUF` adjustments.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net-next v3] tcp: honor BPF_SOCK_OPS_RWND_INIT on the active connect path ---
commit 2cf5d1d17ae1c7488533ecaa0fcbb83ae4591ec8
Author: Tejas Birajdar <tejasbirajdar@meta.com>
tcp: honor BPF_SOCK_OPS_RWND_INIT on the active connect path
This commit updates tcp_connect_init() to honor the initial TCP receive
window requested by a BPF_SOCK_OPS_RWND_INIT program on the active connect
path. It inflates full_space if the program returns a non-zero window,
matching the listener path's behavior, and uses u64 arithmetic to prevent
overflows.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260723214208.3655474-1-tejasbirajdar@meta.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260722170033.2763794-1-tejasbirajdar@meta.com/
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index d7c1444b5e304..fcaa04e65189b 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4137,10 +4138,13 @@ static void tcp_connect_init(struct sock *sk)
> WRITE_ONCE(tp->window_clamp, tcp_full_space(sk));
>
> rcv_wnd = tcp_rwnd_init_bpf(sk);
> + full_space = tcp_full_space(sk);
> if (rcv_wnd == 0)
> rcv_wnd = dst_metric(dst, RTAX_INITRWND);
> + else if (full_space < (u64)rcv_wnd * tp->advmss)
> + full_space = min_t(u64, (u64)rcv_wnd * tp->advmss, INT_MAX);
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK check happening
before the BPF program runs defeat the purpose of allowing BPF to adjust
the receive window?
If an application sets SO_RCVBUF prior to connect(), SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK is
set. In tcp_connect_init(), this caps tp->window_clamp to the old
tcp_full_space() before tcp_rwnd_init_bpf() is invoked.
When the BPF program returns a large requested window and full_space is
inflated, tcp_select_initial_window() bounds space by
min(window_clamp, space).
This caps it right back to the pre-BPF full_space and discards the BPF
request.
Conversely, if the application did not set SO_RCVBUF but the BPF program
adjusts it dynamically (which sets SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK), the enforcement
check has already passed. This means window_clamp may remain 0 and bypass
the lock's constraints, resulting in an unconstrained window.
The same behavior appears to occur in the listener path in
tcp_openreq_init_rwin() in net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c, where
req->rsk_window_clamp is capped to the pre-BPF full_space before the BPF
program executes.
Should the SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK checks be moved after tcp_rwnd_init_bpf() so
that dynamically adjusted SO_RCVBUF values are properly accounted for?
> - tcp_select_initial_window(sk, tcp_full_space(sk),
> + tcp_select_initial_window(sk, full_space,
> tp->advmss - (tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp ? tp->tcp_header_len - sizeof(struct tcphdr) : 0),
> &tp->rcv_wnd,
> &tp->window_clamp,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730220055.2946171-1-tejasbirajdar@meta.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 22:00 [PATCH net-next v3] tcp: honor BPF_SOCK_OPS_RWND_INIT on the active connect path Tejas Birajdar
2026-07-31 22:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731220124.B0C621F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tejasbirajdar@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox