Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: verify zext_dst annotations for various instructions

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Missing bpf_testmod dependency check in test_verifier_zext, causing spurious test failures when the module is not loaded.
--

--- Patch [5]: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: verify zext_dst annotations for various instructions ---
commit 9e656f5e6b04a69526327df6f70d8c362d02d3d4
Author: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

selftests/bpf: verify zext_dst annotations for various instructions

This commit adds a suite of selftests to verify the verifier's zero extension
behavior across various instructions and state pruning scenarios. It covers
cases like 32-bit and 64-bit operations, atomic instructions, kfunc parameters,
and CFG edge cases.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
> index be97f6887f0e7..fba562c819691 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -277,6 +278,7 @@ void test_irq(void)			      { RUN(irq); }
>  void test_verifier_mtu(void)		      { RUN(verifier_mtu); }
>  void test_verifier_jit_inline(void)               { RUN(verifier_jit_inline); }
>  void test_verifier_ctx_ptr_param(void)       { RUN(verifier_ctx_ptr_param); }
> +void test_verifier_zext(void)                 { RUN_TESTS(verifier_zext); }

[Severity: Medium]
Since verifier_zext.c calls bpf_kfunc_call_test4 (an extern kfunc from
bpf_testmod), will this test fail spuriously if bpf_testmod is not loaded?

Should this check env.has_testmod and call test__skip() before RUN_TESTS
to gracefully skip the test when the module is unavailable?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731-static-zext-v2-0-da4aa161e8c5@gmail.com?part=5