BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhiling Zou" <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/1] net: cap advertised device headroom
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 06:22:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260801062215.43E8C1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ae4aa29223b89049727aec4d36f144bad41537e.1785476387.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch attempts to prevent 16-bit skb header offset overflows by capping `needed_headroom` to 512 at device configuration. However, this only mitigates overflows caused by a single massive headroom allocation. It fails to prevent cumulative overflows in the data path. An attacker can chain multiple tunnels and interpose a qdisc like `netem` to bypass the `dev_xmit_recursion()` limit (since `netem` defers transmission to a timer, unwinding the call stack and resetting the recursion counter). Because `needed_headroom` is capped, `skb_cow_head()` will repeatedly calculate a small `delta` and trigger `pskb_expand_head()`. Each call increments the 16-bit header offsets. After enough chained transmissions (e.g., ~1600 tunnels), the offsets will exceed 65535 and wrap around, leading to out-of-bounds reads or writes when the headers are accessed.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net v2 1/1] net: cap advertised device headroom ---
commit 9a8b47db3e094ff90f0e4cb79a3ba54d0ddcaab8
Author: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>

net: cap advertised device headroom
    
IP tunnel and netkit devices can publish headroom values that are derived
from user-created stacked devices or directly supplied netlink attributes.
The dynamic tunnel transmit path already caps growing needed_headroom at
512.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0c6c64e9bbd71a0decc8504a384061e0e631be13.1785054561.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai/

> diff --git a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
> index d708b66e55cda..85e3455cea259 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
> @@ -629,8 +629,7 @@ struct metadata_dst *iptunnel_metadata_reply(struct metadata_dst *md,
>  int skb_tunnel_check_pmtu(struct sk_buff *skb, struct dst_entry *encap_dst,
>  			  int headroom, bool reply);
>  
> -static inline void ip_tunnel_adj_headroom(struct net_device *dev,
> -					  unsigned int headroom)
> +static inline unsigned int ip_tunnel_limit_headroom(unsigned int headroom)
>  {
>  	/* we must cap headroom to some upperlimit, else pskb_expand_head
>  	 * will overflow header offsets in skb_headers_offset_update().
> @@ -640,6 +639,14 @@ static inline void ip_tunnel_adj_headroom(struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (headroom > max_allowed)
>  		headroom = max_allowed;
>  
> +	return headroom;
> +}

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does capping needed_headroom to 512 here
completely mitigate the 16-bit header offset overflow in
skb_headers_offset_update()?

While this prevents a single massive allocation from overflowing the offsets,
it seems it doesn't prevent cumulative overflows in the data path. If a deep
chain of network tunnels is created and a delaying qdisc (like netem) is
attached to each to bypass the dev_xmit_recursion() limit (since netem
defers transmission to a timer, unwinding the call stack and resetting
the recursion counter), skb_cow_head() could repeatedly calculate a small
delta and trigger pskb_expand_head().

Each call increments the 16-bit header offsets in
skb_headers_offset_update():

net/core/skbuff.c:skb_headers_offset_update() {
    ...
    skb->mac_header += off;
    ...
}

After enough chained transmissions, could the offsets exceed 65535 and wrap
around, leading to out-of-bounds reads or writes when the network layers
access the wrapped header pointers?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/0ae4aa29223b89049727aec4d36f144bad41537e.1785476387.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-01  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31  6:21 [PATCH net v2 1/1] net: cap advertised device headroom Zhiling Zou
2026-08-01  6:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260801062215.43E8C1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhilinz@nebusec.ai \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox