From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr2-f0.google.com (mail-wr2-f0.google.com [74.125.225.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 303DA39BFE1 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 07:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.225.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785742058; cv=none; b=BSw5+jsowyp0Zp5I1aeqCpKM58DpgGmVHNfCwbkSGigbcHeAEG+g9Ypr0usAs7N9GrpmBT6C+0gcM+enO7Yb0hqDi8zrbMrzzKfrFWRIRVa4Qjxd5hBZXO1khmTRHw1iOFjagXXY9UeCcDgO2G9GRyGJUDRR7N0KJNWf1oZxUbw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785742058; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fiX4SO33sQrCOuY30ddzwRHh18TmsoTB/t8uaw2rJBM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=LemVNKy78nUE/GRo32tV6Bfa3g1CStoaxj7CJ/kJK2Pa/rnPL4h8++T7DF/QYhwWSxYPwmR93GDYOmvaVtDHGT57j/n/Z/3ISOlIYCg0XYpRKgQ/HSzphtHKmWuvinTeBO0bp95guafRRFUdMJqN0oNzPTOWSlM5j4Oj6iqFF08= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=foaQKVM3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.225.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="foaQKVM3" Received: by mail-wr2-f0.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-47528970fbdso1318910f8f.1 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:27:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1785742055; x=1786346855; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=B3M45FGTDX4E3gQhw9w5a0gLiRSCyOs/qAFWGeH8BgY=; b=foaQKVM3I5cLFNNRGxGBvzvQVj6KoUN6Ss1GrdUdyiXbSXkpM+fexuFZ+wc7MYHNs/ eE0u9WwCh6DBfUpbFklnNHinTjqaQYtMQEbaqBGGKfdH5d69uDCmZ0JyuEmkRWND9tj0 d7Jzl6QsnaQFcHJtd1XCiGcuxM+EjtQZIk8NsNB9wnzoaJpm5J7drEvhGPv795HCUo4x pSmM8Ch1S5bPp2oIkjvsW820TAQnEsl7rJgzu77mQc09ckMEedhWvGbQCjj6mV2LzIz1 enWcQu1LiDytknDdgqFrgYVBkVRqfnVdDmNsizS+MizFYfP0B9yGP0GLcX1KyChuOZGo 9s7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785742055; x=1786346855; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=B3M45FGTDX4E3gQhw9w5a0gLiRSCyOs/qAFWGeH8BgY=; b=s51B8BLt3pyZtghX5jYFtahmVJ+g8p9rUAO+sQ7h9zwveOxNokofxIPd6/wJ/Ynpea jN4s9LXphmfTZtx10nXR931/HzMz27ATCB+T5BxLb11j2D03xBBXxhPo+7/FrkqfVLxJ aM/PI5EH+rs9nIz/eHfeTiU3c/O8S2TVVoqvFbzWfLtYCF55dXeJBgTPtJiKFfWSsI14 3KrTWl7AMWGHCju06blOv8X2UHIvr7BT/l2UdaoKJJPSm4oOz+IHXhBVDqe7iq9LQeh3 dSIPZlqNEhcPnuooTv8A9IRbd7VMRgL1pOTWzRLtVOPF7ggzBtkuAU3XmrHZSUrxPL6w dw9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyTAq7d5ASLK0GlGWSelkXTCgfZD00TgQn1sys9IxWZrvfnCPsL nz978jcWTsFGk18iOnY7LkbC/qgk/BGoZdNDSPRYDfzV6fa+6HGnvf4PlNKvMxq2 X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD12fjp2+Wa9MLMGTRTw6q/lm/ByN6MSmGFQpDif4e9m/a8jIjxY1J197JjE4YtO sG6yniMQI4eMu41N2P2sXVDr2qJdxmHVl+svZu8c3rSY/yLxSc9QXN7nc6bcgI3On6xL05Lp4tr z9w/X6AUMtG2xxxtAV1DwjNT44JaQKoEgwPZwWW5VOr3k6Nd94pbmkelskULIPc/QiqRFiSlmgM wIELOikrlWjhxHAtEJjZFIHin//60sNf8K9wpalBuiL0f3MKxEs7j0wleAnIhFHg6ZnmUD+6IQD KhjAyAr7YKkrzKCv0+o1RrH8WW3gia7D+3T6k+IXh7C/lc0h3ol0zLF1dOHMXUj6b/qr21t+Owx QaMyCjEKg2EAKYRNdkEn3aG+Uw/nr7UDr2oSzSRPwxgS5E8leDNUbdKOhPmtGdJ848m4lT0J//I k2AH6mc4i71GE1Cq+63rQZ/Pj6E+D1og0HIBUSlm5zQoVya0tJuuVR5DAV8DHjGxY5+tZSoZtXd CNXMv3Lm5rmgiDZ5xevCvv6Tu57sh5lOcH3BPr2FgDnOeJv4f4op/ga34OTe+T9umd4wyvU81mI SfTUTLDMX6ubDVdCjQksVN4//6M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:22c2:b0:47f:c648:e265 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-47fd9cf7670mr21007523f8f.17.1785742055368; Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nat-icclus-192-26-29-3.epfl.ch. [192.26.29.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-47fd41d1756sm29375574f8f.4.2026.08.03.00.27.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:27:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Eduard Zingerman , Emil Tsalapatis , kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf: Show more useful info in stack depth stats Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:27:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20260803072733.191502-2-memxor@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260803072733.191502-1-memxor@gmail.com> References: <20260803072733.191502-1-memxor@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=8865; i=memxor@gmail.com; h=from:subject; bh=fiX4SO33sQrCOuY30ddzwRHh18TmsoTB/t8uaw2rJBM=; b=owGbwMvMwCXmrmtenRyi38x4Wi2JIavA6fqU37xvXxoHO1w2LT2rImP1WlDK+v62/Vwi9roX5 fsPvVHuKGVhEONikBVTZCn5v4/J+ETl70DbZdwwc1iZQIYwcHEKwESmLmBkuP0v7f6alpMa3gdv hex+1fwwheWu9pKNOqzdQXxp85p8JjL8szE4ssAjl8Nk9zpPk/mlXROM/r1boX90psWEv0kBV7m fcgIA X-Developer-Key: i=memxor@gmail.com; a=openpgp; fpr=B34BD741DE8494B76E2F717880EF20021D46C59B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Currently, stack depth statistics are too crude, listing captured depths in subprogram-number order. Since libbpf determines those numbers, it is hard to associate each depth with its subprogram name. Print the maximum stack depth and each subprogram on separate lines: stack depth max stack depth subprog When no subprogram name is available, print . Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 +++++++---- .../bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c | 4 ++-- .../bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c | 23 ++++++++++++------- .../bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c | 15 +++++++++--- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_var_off.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index b274004fccfd..3b61897ed0d2 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -18777,10 +18777,15 @@ static void print_verification_stats(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_STATS) { verbose(env, "verification time %lld usec\n", div_u64(env->verification_time, 1000)); - verbose(env, "stack depth %d", env->subprog_info[0].stack_depth); - for (i = 1; i < subprog_cnt; i++) - verbose(env, "+%d", env->subprog_info[i].stack_depth); - verbose(env, " max %d\n", env->max_stack_depth); + verbose(env, "stack depth max %d\n", env->max_stack_depth); + for (i = 0; i < subprog_cnt; i++) { + const char *name = env->subprog_info[i].name; + + if (!name || !name[0]) + name = ""; + verbose(env, "stack depth subprog %d %s %d\n", i, name, + env->subprog_info[i].stack_depth); + } verbose(env, "insns processed %d", env->subprog_info[0].insn_processed); for (i = 1; i < subprog_cnt; i++) if (bpf_subprog_is_global(env, i)) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c index fb62e09f2114..61ec8790fd21 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_basic_stack.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ __naked void stack_out_of_bounds(void) SEC("socket") __description("uninitialized stack1") -__success __log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8") +__success __log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 uninitialized_stack1 8") __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("invalid read from stack") __naked void uninitialized_stack1(void) { @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ __naked void uninitialized_stack1(void) SEC("socket") __description("uninitialized stack2") -__success __log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8") +__success __log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 uninitialized_stack2 8") __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("invalid read from stack") __naked void uninitialized_stack2(void) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c index 83707faea049..cb36866bfed3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ SEC("raw_tp") __arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 simple 8") __xlated("4: r5 = 5") __xlated("5: r0 = ") __xlated("6: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ __naked void canary_zero_spills(void) SEC("raw_tp") __arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 16") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 wrong_reg_in_pattern1 16") __xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1") __xlated("...") __xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ __naked static void subprogs_use_independent_offsets_aux(void) SEC("raw_tp") __arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 helper_call_does_not_prevent_bpf_fastcall 8") __xlated("2: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") __success __naked void helper_call_does_not_prevent_bpf_fastcall(void) @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ __naked void helper_call_does_not_prevent_bpf_fastcall(void) SEC("raw_tp") __arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 24") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 may_goto_interaction_x86_64 24") /* may_goto counter at -24 */ __xlated("0: *(u64 *)(r10 -24) =") /* may_goto timestamp at -16 */ @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ __naked void may_goto_interaction_x86_64(void) SEC("raw_tp") __arch_arm64 __arch_riscv64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 24") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 may_goto_interaction 24") /* may_goto counter at -24 */ __xlated("0: *(u64 *)(r10 -24) =") /* may_goto timestamp at -16 */ @@ -708,7 +708,9 @@ __naked static void dummy_loop_callback(void) SEC("raw_tp") __arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 32+0") +__log_level(4) +__msg("stack depth subprog 0 bpf_loop_interaction1 32") +__msg("stack depth subprog 1 dummy_loop_callback 0") __xlated("2: r1 = 1") __xlated("3: r0 =") __xlated("4: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") @@ -756,7 +758,9 @@ __naked int bpf_loop_interaction1(void) SEC("raw_tp") __arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 40+0") +__log_level(4) +__msg("stack depth subprog 0 bpf_loop_interaction2 40") +__msg("stack depth subprog 1 dummy_loop_callback 0") /* call bpf_get_smp_processor_id */ __xlated("2: r1 = 42") __xlated("3: r0 =") @@ -800,7 +804,10 @@ __naked int bpf_loop_interaction2(void) SEC("raw_tp") __arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 512+0 max 512") +__log_level(4) +__msg("stack depth max 512") +__msg("stack depth subprog 0 cumulative_stack_depth 512") +__msg("stack depth subprog 1 cumulative_stack_depth_subprog 0") /* just to print xlated version when debugging */ __xlated("r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") __success diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c index bb8206e10880..c818898836c1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c @@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ __naked static void cumulative_stack_depth_subprog(void) SEC("kprobe") __description("Private stack, subtree > MAX_BPF_STACK") __success -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 512+32 max 512") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth max 512") +__msg("stack depth subprog 0 private_stack_nested_1 512") +__msg("stack depth subprog 1 cumulative_stack_depth_subprog 32") __arch_x86_64 /* private stack fp for the main prog */ __jited(" movabsq $0x{{.*}}, %r9") @@ -331,7 +333,11 @@ SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test9") __description("Private stack, async callback, potential nesting") __success __retval(0) __load_if_JITed() -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8+0+256+0 max 272") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth max 272") +__msg("stack depth subprog 0 private_stack_async_callback_2 8") +__msg("stack depth subprog 1 timer_cb1 0") +__msg("stack depth subprog 2 subprog1 256") +__msg("stack depth subprog 3 subprog2 0") __arch_x86_64 __jited(" subq $0x100, %rsp") __arch_arm64 @@ -355,7 +361,10 @@ int private_stack_async_callback_2(void) SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test9") __description("private stack, max stack depth is private stack") __success -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8+256+0 max 256") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth max 256") +__msg("stack depth subprog 0 private_stack_max_depth 8") +__msg("stack depth subprog 1 subprog1 256") +__msg("stack depth subprog 2 subprog2 0") int private_stack_max_depth(void) { int x = 0; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_var_off.c index 24cd0a763673..df436bbc9ecf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_var_off.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_var_off.c @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ __success /* Check that the maximum stack depth is correctly maintained according to the * maximum possible variable offset. */ -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 16") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv 16") __failure_unpriv /* Variable stack access is rejected for unprivileged. */ @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ __success /* Check that the maximum stack depth is correctly maintained according to the * maximum possible variable offset. */ -__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 16") +__log_level(4) __msg("stack depth subprog 0 stack_write_followed_by_read 16") __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root") __retval(0) -- 2.53.0