From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yangyu Chen" <cyy@cyyself.name>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: atlantic: free RX pages of consumed but not refilled buffers
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:46:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803154652.CD4691F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_607CBA8237DA438E36B844318B21538DE008@qq.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Malformed or oversized RX descriptor chains cause a permanent NAPI polling lockup or hard infinite loop.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH net 2/2] net: atlantic: free RX pages of consumed but not refilled buffers ---
commit f13d9fd8fe93327bbe27469851140df3b966b786
Author: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
net: atlantic: free RX pages of consumed but not refilled buffers
aq_ring_rx_deinit() only walks the region posted to hardware. Slots that
were consumed but not yet reposted sit in a gap with a live page, and the
deinit walk never visits them, causing a page and DMA mapping leak. This
patch walks the whole ring instead and releases whatever is still there.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2+
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.c
> index 81685a4dc5a6d..e1193c6719d9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -950,15 +950,29 @@ int aq_ring_rx_fill(struct aq_ring_s *self)
>
> void aq_ring_rx_deinit(struct aq_ring_s *self)
> {
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error handling in
__aq_ring_rx_clean() and __aq_ring_xdp_clean() cause a permanent NAPI polling
lockup or an infinite loop when processing malformed RX descriptors?
In __aq_ring_rx_clean(), if a descriptor chain is out of bounds or exceeds the
maximum fragment count, the function exits early without advancing sw_head:
drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.c:__aq_ring_rx_clean() {
...
if (buff_->next >= self->size) {
err = -EIO;
goto err_exit;
}
...
if (unlikely(!is_rsc_completed) ||
frag_cnt > MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
err = 0;
goto err_exit;
}
...
}
Because sw_head is not advanced, wouldn't the next NAPI poll process the
exact same malformed descriptor again, resulting in an infinite NAPI polling
loop?
Additionally, in __aq_ring_xdp_clean(), there is a do-while loop that lacks a
fragment count limit:
drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ring.c:__aq_ring_xdp_clean() {
...
do {
if (buff_->next >= rx_ring->size) {
err = -EIO;
goto err_exit;
}
next_ = buff_->next;
buff_ = &rx_ring->buff_ring[next_];
is_rsc_completed =
aq_ring_dx_in_range(rx_ring->sw_head,
next_,
rx_ring->hw_head);
if (unlikely(!is_rsc_completed))
break;
buff->is_error |= buff_->is_error;
buff->is_cso_err |= buff_->is_cso_err;
} while (!buff_->is_eop);
...
}
If the descriptor chain is cyclic and within the valid range, could this
cause a hard infinite loop inside the softirq handler?
Also, if the index is out of bounds in __aq_ring_xdp_clean(), it jumps to
err_exit without advancing sw_head. Could this cause the same NAPI poll storm
as in __aq_ring_rx_clean()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/tencent_29B860317921D68DE77C718242DA418EB608@qq.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 15:44 [PATCH net 0/2] net: atlantic: fix two ring teardown leaks Yangyu Chen
2026-08-02 15:46 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: atlantic: free stranded TX buffers on ring deinit Yangyu Chen
2026-08-03 15:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:31 ` Mina Almasry
2026-08-02 15:46 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: atlantic: free RX pages of consumed but not refilled buffers Yangyu Chen
2026-08-03 15:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 18:35 ` Mina Almasry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803154652.CD4691F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox