From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor stackid_init function from __bpf_get_stackid
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 09:40:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805094038.50F0C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805092843.516315-2-jolsa@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Integer underflow in stack_map_calculate_max_depth causes a heap buffer overflow when sysctl_perf_event_max_stack is concurrently modified.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor stackid_init function from __bpf_get_stackid ---
commit 036b334d8e7b51a2339ee19596a116e90ed56c01
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
bpf: Factor stackid_init function from __bpf_get_stackid
The new stackid_init function stores all the necessary bits for stackid
trace and it will be used by other functions in following changes.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
[ ... ]
> +static int stackid_init(struct stackid *stackid, struct bpf_map *map,
> + struct perf_callchain_entry *trace, u64 flags)
> {
> struct bpf_stack_map *smap = container_of(map, struct bpf_stack_map, map);
> u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
> + u32 max_depth;
>
> if (trace->nr <= skip)
> /* skipping more than usable stack trace */
> return -EFAULT;
>
> max_depth = stack_map_calculate_max_depth(map->value_size, stack_map_data_size(map), flags);
> + stackid->nr = min_t(u32, trace->nr - skip, max_depth - skip);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this max_depth - skip calculation
underflow?
If sysctl_perf_event_max_stack is decreased concurrently,
stack_map_calculate_max_depth() can return a max_depth smaller than skip:
kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:stack_map_calculate_max_depth() {
...
max_depth += skip;
if (max_depth > curr_sysctl_max_stack)
return curr_sysctl_max_stack;
...
}
This would cause max_depth - skip to underflow to a large integer. If
trace->nr (which may have been captured with the older, larger sysctl) is
greater than skip, it passes the early return check.
The min_t() call would then select trace->nr - skip, which can exceed the
stack map's element capacity and lead to a heap buffer overflow later when
copying entries into the bucket buffer in __bpf_get_stackid():
kernel/bpf/stackmap.c:__bpf_get_stackid() {
...
memcpy(new_bucket->data, stackid->ips, stackid->len);
...
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805092843.516315-2-jolsa@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 9:28 [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Disable preemption in stack map code Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Factor stackid_init function from __bpf_get_stackid Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Factor stackid_fastpath " Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Factor stackid_new_bucket " Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Use stack id functions instead of __bpf_get_stackid Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Disable preemption in bpf_get_stackid Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Factor callchain_store function from __bpf_get_stack Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 07/12] bpf: Factor callchain_finalize " Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Remove trace_in argument " Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 09/12] bpf: Clear buf on error in __bpf_get_task_stack Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 10/12] bpf: Disable preemption in __bpf_get_stack Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 18:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-08-05 20:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 11/12] bpf: Avoid changing callchain in bpf_get_stack_pe Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 9:28 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 12/12] bpf: Avoid changing callchain in bpf_get_stackid_pe Jiri Olsa
2026-08-05 18:36 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Disable preemption in stack map code Andrii Nakryiko
2026-08-05 18:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805094038.50F0C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox