From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test sleepable context distinctions
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:40:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806164049.3158887-3-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806164049.3158887-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Exercise verifier decisions which depend on the complete sleepable context
rather than only the current state's in_sleepable bit.
Verify that preemption-disabled and IRQ-disabled regions provide implicit RCU
protection to KF_RCU_PROTECTED css iterators. Also verify that iterator
pointers become untrusted after the final preemption enable or IRQ restore,
and that css_task iterators are rejected in explicit RCU, preemption-disabled,
and IRQ-disabled regions of sleepable programs.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_failure.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_failure.c
index fe3663dedbe1..0a2ea8b6adda 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_failure.c
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ struct cgroup *bpf_cgroup_from_id(u64 cgid) __ksym;
void bpf_cgroup_release(struct cgroup *p) __ksym;
void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void) __ksym;
void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void) __ksym;
+void bpf_local_irq_save(unsigned long *flags) __weak __ksym;
+void bpf_local_irq_restore(unsigned long *flags) __weak __ksym;
SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
__failure __msg("kernel func bpf_iter_task_new requires RCU critical section protection")
@@ -84,6 +86,157 @@ int BPF_PROG(iter_css_lock_and_unlock)
return 0;
}
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__success
+int BPF_PROG(iter_css_preempt)
+{
+ u64 cg_id = bpf_get_current_cgroup_id();
+ struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cg_id);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *root_css, *pos;
+
+ if (!cgrp)
+ return 0;
+ root_css = &cgrp->self;
+
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ bpf_for_each(css, pos, root_css, BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST) {}
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__success
+int BPF_PROG(iter_css_irq)
+{
+ u64 cg_id = bpf_get_current_cgroup_id();
+ struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cg_id);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *root_css, *pos;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!cgrp)
+ return 0;
+ root_css = &cgrp->self;
+
+ bpf_local_irq_save(&flags);
+ bpf_for_each(css, pos, root_css, BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST) {}
+ bpf_local_irq_restore(&flags);
+ bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__failure __msg("R2 must be referenced or trusted")
+int BPF_PROG(iter_css_preempt_escape)
+{
+ u64 cg_id = bpf_get_current_cgroup_id();
+ struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cg_id);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *root_css, *pos;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ if (!cgrp)
+ return 0;
+ root_css = &cgrp->self;
+
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ bpf_for_each(css, pos, root_css, BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST) {
+ break;
+ }
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ if (pos) {
+ bpf_for_each(css_task, task, pos, CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS) {}
+ }
+ bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__failure __msg("R2 must be referenced or trusted")
+int BPF_PROG(iter_css_irq_escape)
+{
+ u64 cg_id = bpf_get_current_cgroup_id();
+ struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cg_id);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *root_css, *pos;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!cgrp)
+ return 0;
+ root_css = &cgrp->self;
+
+ bpf_local_irq_save(&flags);
+ bpf_for_each(css, pos, root_css, BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST) {
+ break;
+ }
+ bpf_local_irq_restore(&flags);
+ if (pos) {
+ bpf_for_each(css_task, task, pos, CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS) {}
+ }
+ bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__failure __msg("css_task_iter is only allowed in bpf_lsm, bpf_iter and sleepable progs")
+int BPF_PROG(iter_css_task_rcu)
+{
+ u64 cg_id = bpf_get_current_cgroup_id();
+ struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cg_id);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ if (!cgrp)
+ return 0;
+ css = &cgrp->self;
+
+ bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+ bpf_for_each(css_task, task, css, CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS) {}
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+ bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__failure __msg("css_task_iter is only allowed in bpf_lsm, bpf_iter and sleepable progs")
+int BPF_PROG(iter_css_task_preempt)
+{
+ u64 cg_id = bpf_get_current_cgroup_id();
+ struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cg_id);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ if (!cgrp)
+ return 0;
+ css = &cgrp->self;
+
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ bpf_for_each(css_task, task, css, CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS) {}
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__failure __msg("css_task_iter is only allowed in bpf_lsm, bpf_iter and sleepable progs")
+int BPF_PROG(iter_css_task_irq)
+{
+ u64 cg_id = bpf_get_current_cgroup_id();
+ struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(cg_id);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!cgrp)
+ return 0;
+ css = &cgrp->self;
+
+ bpf_local_irq_save(&flags);
+ bpf_for_each(css_task, task, css, CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS) {}
+ bpf_local_irq_restore(&flags);
+ bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("?fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
__failure __msg("css_task_iter is only allowed in bpf_lsm, bpf_iter and sleepable progs")
int BPF_PROG(iter_css_task_for_each)
--
2.53.0-Meta
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 16:40 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/2] Fix sleepable context checks in verifier Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-06 16:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] bpf: Fix sleepable context checks and remove in_sleepable helper Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-06 17:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-06 21:22 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-06 22:17 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-06 21:10 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-06 21:20 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-06 21:46 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-06 16:40 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806164049.3158887-3-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox