From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vineet Gupta" <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Sanitize traffic monitor log file names
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 21:17:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806211740.E9F851F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806211105.3307932-1-vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The backslash character `\` is missing from the sanitization string, leaving artifact names vulnerable to rejection by GitHub Actions.
- [Low] The newly introduced multi-line comment violates the BPF subsystem's strict comment style guidelines.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Sanitize traffic monitor log file names ---
commit 4eb40c6024aab5f28e7a52af3fba116cbdeff427
Author: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
selftests/bpf: Sanitize traffic monitor log file names
The traffic monitor names its capture logs after the test and subtest
being run, replacing '/' and ' ' so the result is usable as a file name.
This patch replaces the whole set of awkward characters in one pass to
fix artifact upload failures in CI systems like GitHub Actions.
Link: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/actions/runs/30710914503/job/91399011388 [1]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
> index db935a9d9fc1a..3818cec354a0d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
> @@ -1142,10 +1142,13 @@ static void encode_test_name(char *buf, size_t len, const char *test_name, const
> snprintf(buf, len, "%s__%s", test_name, subtest_name);
> else
> snprintf(buf, len, "%s", test_name);
> - while ((p = strchr(buf, '/')))
> - *p = '_';
> - while ((p = strchr(buf, ' ')))
> - *p = '_';
> + /* Test names are free form, so replace anything that is awkward in a
> + * file name. Besides the path separator, this covers the characters
> + * rejected by CI systems collecting these logs as artifacts.
> + */
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but does this multi-line comment in encode_test_name()
conflict with the BPF subsystem's comment style guidelines? The opening /*
is typically expected to be placed on its own line.
> + for (p = buf; *p; p++)
> + if (strchr("/ \":<>|*?\r\n", *p))
[Severity: Medium]
Since this is meant to cover characters rejected by CI systems like GitHub
Actions, should the backslash character '\\' also be included in this
sanitization string?
If a test or subtest name contains a backslash, it appears the artifact
upload could still fail.
> + *p = '_';
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806211105.3307932-1-vineet.gupta@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 21:11 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Sanitize traffic monitor log file names Vineet Gupta
2026-08-06 21:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 21:37 ` Vineet Gupta
2026-08-06 21:53 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-08-06 21:57 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806211740.E9F851F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox