BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chenyuan_fl@163.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpftool: fix batch file handling issues
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:04:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810090459.2666243-1-chenyuan_fl@163.com> (raw)

From: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>

This series fixes three issues in bpftool's batch file handling:

 1. map dump closes the map fd twice (introduced by the map-by-name
    dump refactor).
 2. do_batch() reports a spurious read failure because a stale errno
    from a previously executed command is used instead of checking the
    FILE stream state.
 3. a line longer than the batch buffer that contains a '#' within the
    buffered prefix bypasses the line length check: the comment
    stripping truncates the buffer before the length is checked, so the
    unread remainder of the line is parsed and executed as a separate
    command on the next loop iteration. Continuation lines are affected
    the same way, bypassing the "command is too long" check.

Changes in v4:
  - Extend patch 3 to also cover continuation lines, whose comment
    stripping bypasses the "command is too long" check the same way, as
    pointed out in review.
  - Drop the USE_LIBCAP errno reset in main(), which existed only to
    keep errno clean for the batch mode and is no longer needed now
    that do_batch() detects read failures with ferror(), as pointed out
    in review.

Changes in v3:
  - Add patch 3 fixing the pre-existing comment-stripping bypass of the
    batch line length check, as pointed out in review.

Yuan Chen (3):
  bpftool: fix double close in map dump
  bpftool: fix spurious batch file read error
  bpftool: Fix bypass of the batch line length check by comments

 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c  |  1 -
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.54.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10  9:04 chenyuan_fl [this message]
2026-08-10  9:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpftool: fix double close in map dump chenyuan_fl
2026-08-10  9:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10  9:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] bpftool: fix spurious batch file read error chenyuan_fl
2026-08-10  9:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 10:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-10  9:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] bpftool: Fix bypass of the batch line length check by comments chenyuan_fl
2026-08-10  9:14   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810090459.2666243-1-chenyuan_fl@163.com \
    --to=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenyuan@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox