BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nick Hudson" <nhudson@akamai.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/6] bpf: allow new DECAP flags and add guard rails
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:22:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812102300.0BF711F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812083115.73100-5-nhudson@akamai.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch exposes new decapsulation flags without implementing the required kernel side effects to clear tunnel-specific GSO flags and `skb->encapsulation` status, leading to stale tunnel metadata on decapsulated packets.
- [High] The `decap` flag check in `bpf_skb_net_shrink()` was not updated to include the new L4 and IPXIP decapsulation masks, causing critical packet state updates (like dropping the outer `dst_entry`) to be skipped.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/6] bpf: allow new DECAP flags and add guard rails ---
commit cdd433d824d20f40752fca9cc2db82451d364a2c
Author: Nick Hudson <nhudson@akamai.com>

bpf: allow new DECAP flags and add guard rails

Add checks to require shrink-only decap, reject conflicting decap flag
combinations, and verify removed length is sufficient for claimed header
decapsulation.

> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 89e516049c852..981b75941e7f7 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3579,7 +3586,9 @@ static u32 bpf_skb_net_base_len(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>  					 BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_ENCAP_L2( \
>  					  BPF_ADJ_ROOM_ENCAP_L2_MASK))
>  
> -#define BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_MASK	(BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK)
> +#define BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_MASK	(BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK | \
> +					 BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_MASK | \
> +					 BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_IPXIP_MASK)

[Severity: High]
Does this mask update also need to be reflected in the decap check in
bpf_skb_net_shrink()?

Currently, bpf_skb_net_shrink() evaluates decap based only on the L3 mask:

net/core/filter.c:bpf_skb_net_shrink() {
	bool decap = flags & BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK;
	...
	if (decap) {
		...
		if (skb_valid_dst(skb))
			skb_dst_drop(skb);
	}
	...
}

If a BPF program uses BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_UDP to decapsulate an L4 or
IPXIP tunnel but does not provide BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L3_MASK, decap
evaluates to false.

As a result, skb_dst_drop(skb) is skipped, causing the inner packet to
incorrectly inherit the outer tunnel's routing cache. This can route the
inner packet to the tunnel endpoint instead of its true destination.

[Severity: High]
Does this code miss clearing tunnel-specific GSO flags and skb->encapsulation
status?

The UAPI documentation promises that using BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_UDP will
clear UDP tunnel GSO flags (SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL and SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM)
when decapsulating a UDP tunnel.

However, bpf_skb_net_shrink() omits the logic to do this:

net/core/filter.c:bpf_skb_net_shrink() {
	...
	ret = bpf_skb_net_hdr_pop(skb, off, len_diff);
	if (unlikely(ret < 0))
		return ret;

	if (decap) {
		/* Match skb->protocol to new outer l3 protocol */
	...
}

Leaving stale tunnel metadata on the packet can cause downstream drivers to
parse incorrect header offsets, resulting in skb_over_panic or
skb_under_panic.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812083115.73100-1-nhudson@akamai.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12  8:31 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/6] bpf: decap flags and GSO state updates Nick Hudson
2026-08-12  8:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/6] bpf: name the enum for BPF_FUNC_skb_adjust_room flags Nick Hudson
2026-08-12  8:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/6] bpf: refactor masks for ADJ_ROOM flags and encap validation Nick Hudson
2026-08-12 10:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12  8:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/6] bpf: add BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_* flags for tunnel decapsulation Nick Hudson
2026-08-12  8:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/6] bpf: allow new DECAP flags and add guard rails Nick Hudson
2026-08-12 10:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 12:13     ` Hudson, Nick
2026-08-12 10:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12  8:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/6] bpf: clear decap state on skb_adjust_room shrink path Nick Hudson
2026-08-12 10:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 12:30     ` Hudson, Nick
2026-08-12 10:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-12  8:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 6/6] selftests/bpf: tc_tunnel - validate decap GSO and encapsulation state Nick Hudson
2026-08-12 10:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 12:23     ` Hudson, Nick
2026-08-12 10:48   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812102300.0BF711F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhudson@akamai.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox