From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test a multi-slot argument before a struct_ops arena argument
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:03:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813190356.335181-8-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813190356.335181-1-puranjay@kernel.org>
The trampoline reads the __arena flag from the btf_func_model per
argument but stores the ctx one register slot at a time, so the two only
line up if every preceding argument occupies exactly one slot. Every
arena-bearing member of bpf_testmod_ops3 takes single-slot arguments, so
nothing exercises the mapping and a mis-indexed arg_flags lookup would
go unnoticed on any architecture.
Add test_arena_multislot(), whose first argument is a 16-byte struct
passed by value. It fills ctx[0] and ctx[1], putting the arena pointer
at argument index one but slot two. The callback checks both halves of
the struct before dereferencing ctx[2], so a JIT that walks registers
instead of arguments converts the wrong slot and fails the test.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_arena.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 15 ++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h | 8 +++++++
.../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_arena.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_arena.c
index ba04c73d8d967..8aa8639df91f0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_arena.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_arena.c
@@ -59,11 +59,28 @@ int test_arena_stack_cb(unsigned long long *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("struct_ops/test_arena_multislot")
+int test_arena_multislot_cb(unsigned long long *ctx)
+{
+ u64 __arena *ptr = (u64 __arena *)ctx[2];
+
+ arena_touch++;
+ /*
+ * The 16-byte struct occupies ctx[0] and ctx[1], so @ptr is argument
+ * one but slot two. Getting that wrong hands the callback a scalar.
+ */
+ if (ctx[0] != 11 || ctx[1] != 22)
+ return 0xbad;
+ *ptr += 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct bpf_testmod_ops3 testmod_arena = {
.test_arena = (void *)test_arena_cb,
.test_arena_nullable = (void *)test_arena_nullable_cb,
.test_arena_stack = (void *)test_arena_stack_cb,
+ .test_arena_multislot = (void *)test_arena_multislot_cb,
};
SEC("syscall")
@@ -109,6 +126,13 @@ int trigger(void *ctx)
if (*val != 44)
return 9;
+ /* a multi-slot arg precedes the arena pointer here */
+ ret = bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_multislot((u64 *)val);
+ if (ret)
+ return 10;
+ if (*val != 45)
+ return 11;
+
bpf_arena_free_pages(&arena, (void __arena *)val, 1);
#endif
return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index a6133f7521f34..9366a3c578f13 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -402,12 +402,19 @@ static int bpf_testmod_ops3__test_arena_stack(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c, u64 d,
return 0;
}
+static int bpf_testmod_ops3__test_arena_multislot(struct bpf_testmod_arena_pair p,
+ u64 *ptr__arena)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct bpf_testmod_ops3 __bpf_testmod_ops3 = {
.test_1 = bpf_testmod_test_3,
.test_2 = bpf_testmod_test_4,
.test_arena = bpf_testmod_ops3__test_arena,
.test_arena_nullable = bpf_testmod_ops3__test_arena_nullable,
.test_arena_stack = bpf_testmod_ops3__test_arena_stack,
+ .test_arena_multislot = bpf_testmod_ops3__test_arena_multislot,
};
static void bpf_testmod_test_struct_ops3(void)
@@ -441,6 +448,13 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_stack(u64 *ptr__arena)
return st_ops3->test_arena_stack(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ptr__arena);
}
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_multislot(u64 *ptr__arena)
+{
+ struct bpf_testmod_arena_pair p = { .a = 11, .b = 22 };
+
+ return st_ops3->test_arena_multislot(p, ptr__arena);
+}
+
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 {
int a;
};
@@ -852,6 +866,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_nullable)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_stack)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_multislot)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_get_default_trusted_ptr_test);
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_put_default_trusted_ptr_test);
BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
index 33f2af5b70857..210b919290cc2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -103,6 +103,12 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops2 {
int (*test_1)(void);
};
+/* 16 bytes, so it takes two argument slots when passed by value */
+struct bpf_testmod_arena_pair {
+ u64 a;
+ u64 b;
+};
+
struct bpf_testmod_ops3 {
int (*test_1)(void);
int (*test_2)(void);
@@ -112,6 +118,8 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops3 {
/* enough leading args to force @ptr onto the stack on x86 and arm64 */
int (*test_arena_stack)(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c, u64 d, u64 e, u64 f,
u64 g, u64 h, u64 *ptr);
+ /* a multi-slot leading arg, so @ptr is not at the slot its arg index suggests */
+ int (*test_arena_multislot)(struct bpf_testmod_arena_pair p, u64 *ptr);
};
struct st_ops_args {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index c4383acb53c11..7d81070eefe7f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ void bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i) __ksym;
int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena(__u64 *ptr__arena) __ksym;
int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_nullable(__u64 *ptr__arena__nullable) __ksym;
int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_stack(__u64 *ptr__arena) __ksym;
+int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_arena_multislot(__u64 *ptr__arena) __ksym;
__u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test1(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u64 b,
__u32 c, __u64 d) __ksym;
--
2.53.0-Meta
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 19:03 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] bpf, arm64: __arena kfunc and struct_ops arguments Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-13 19:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] bpf, arm64: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-13 20:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-13 19:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] arm64: insn: Add encoder for ADD/SUB (extended register) Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-13 19:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf, arm64: JIT __arena kfunc argument rebasing Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-13 19:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf, arm64: Convert struct_ops arena arguments in the trampoline Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-13 19:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/7] selftests/bpf: Add arm64 JIT-sequence tests for __arena kfunc arguments Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-13 19:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/7] selftests/bpf: Enable __arena argument tests on arm64 Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-13 19:03 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813190356.335181-8-puranjay@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huawei.com \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox