BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: eddyz87@gmail.com
Cc: memxor@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] bpf: Rewrite any fault prone load out of a mem or btf_id pointer
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:52:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814215301.709827-4-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814215301.709827-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf_convert_ctx_accesses() turns a BPF_LDX into a BPF_PROBE_MEM one by
matching the type recorded for the insn against a list of exact pointer
types. The list cannot keep up with the flag combinations the verifier
produces, and a type which is missing from it ends up as a plain load
without an exception table entry, so a bad address panics the kernel
instead of being handled.

Two such types exist today and are reachable:

  - PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF
  - PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED | MEM_RCU

Rather than adding the two, just drop the list and state the property
itself in the default case of the switch. This is a superset of what
the list matched, the untrusted PTR_TO_MEM does not have to carry
MEM_RDONLY for it anymore, and it stays in sync with the verifier side
which uses the same match in save_aux_ptr_type() and reg_type_mismatch_ok().

Assert that a fault prone type which does not get the rewrite for whatever
reason is rejected at load time rather than left to fault at runtime to
catch any future cases.

Fixes: 1b12171533a9 ("bpf: Mark direct ld of stashed bpf_{rb,list}_node as non-owning ref")
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
 v1 -> v2:
   - new patch, don't match on full types (Eduard)

 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 11 +++++++++
 kernel/bpf/fixups.c          | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 15 ++----------
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 114ae4540d2c..7239cffa7b51 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -1297,6 +1297,17 @@ static inline u32 type_flag(u32 type)
 	return type & ~BPF_BASE_TYPE_MASK;
 }
 
+static inline bool bpf_is_ptr_to_mem_or_btf_id(enum bpf_reg_type type)
+{
+	switch (base_type(type)) {
+	case PTR_TO_MEM:
+	case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
 static inline bool bpf_may_fault_on_deref(enum bpf_reg_type type)
 {
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
index c4bd70befbb5..796fba0505dc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
@@ -811,6 +811,7 @@ int bpf_convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
 		bpf_convert_ctx_access_t convert_ctx_access;
+		enum bpf_reg_type ptr_type;
 		u8 mode;
 
 		if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].nospec) {
@@ -903,7 +904,8 @@ int bpf_convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		switch ((int)env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type) {
+		ptr_type = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type;
+		switch ((int)ptr_type) {
 		case PTR_TO_CTX:
 			if (!ops->convert_ctx_access)
 				continue;
@@ -919,26 +921,6 @@ int bpf_convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		case PTR_TO_XDP_SOCK:
 			convert_ctx_access = bpf_xdp_sock_convert_ctx_access;
 			break;
-		case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
-		case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED:
-		/* PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC always has a valid lifetime, unlike
-		 * PTR_TO_BTF_ID, and an active referenced id, but the same cannot
-		 * be said once it is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED, hence we must handle
-		 * any faults for loads into such types. BPF_WRITE is disallowed
-		 * for this case.
-		 */
-		case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_UNTRUSTED:
-		case PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY | PTR_UNTRUSTED:
-			if (type == BPF_READ) {
-				if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM)
-					insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM |
-						     BPF_SIZE((insn)->code);
-				else
-					insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEMSX |
-						     BPF_SIZE((insn)->code);
-				env->prog->aux->num_exentries++;
-			}
-			continue;
 		case PTR_TO_ARENA:
 			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEMSX) {
 				if (!bpf_jit_supports_insn(insn, true)) {
@@ -952,6 +934,29 @@ int bpf_convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			env->prog->aux->num_exentries++;
 			continue;
 		default:
+			/*
+			 * A pointer which may fault on a dereference must not
+			 * be loaded from without fault protection, hence turn
+			 * the BPF_LDX into a BPF_PROBE_MEM one so that a bad
+			 * address is handled rather than panicking the kernel.
+			 * A store through one is rejected earlier, there is no
+			 * probed counterpart to rewrite it into.
+			 */
+			if (bpf_is_ptr_to_mem_or_btf_id(ptr_type) &&
+			    bpf_may_fault_on_deref(ptr_type) &&
+			    type == BPF_READ) {
+				if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM)
+					insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM |
+						     BPF_SIZE(insn->code);
+				else
+					insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEMSX |
+						     BPF_SIZE(insn->code);
+				env->prog->aux->num_exentries++;
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (verifier_bug_if(bpf_may_fault_on_deref(ptr_type), env,
+					    "access to a fault prone pointer is not rewritten as a probed one"))
+				return -EFAULT;
 			continue;
 		}
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6610e2437047..6fff370749bf 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -16999,17 +16999,6 @@ static bool reg_type_mismatch(enum bpf_reg_type src, enum bpf_reg_type prev)
 			       !reg_type_mismatch_ok(prev));
 }
 
-static bool is_ptr_to_mem_or_btf_id(enum bpf_reg_type type)
-{
-	switch (base_type(type)) {
-	case PTR_TO_MEM:
-	case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
-		return true;
-	default:
-		return false;
-	}
-}
-
 static bool is_ptr_to_mem(enum bpf_reg_type type)
 {
 	return base_type(type) == PTR_TO_MEM;
@@ -17049,8 +17038,8 @@ static int save_aux_ptr_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_reg_type typ
 		 * Reject it.
 		 */
 		if (allow_trust_mismatch &&
-		    is_ptr_to_mem_or_btf_id(type) &&
-		    is_ptr_to_mem_or_btf_id(*prev_type)) {
+		    bpf_is_ptr_to_mem_or_btf_id(type) &&
+		    bpf_is_ptr_to_mem_or_btf_id(*prev_type)) {
 			/*
 			 * Have to support a use case when one path through
 			 * the program yields a TRUSTED pointer while another
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 21:52 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] bpf: Keep fault protection when merging pointer types Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-14 21:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf: Treat a fault prone PTR_TO_MEM as a pointer type mismatch Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-16 19:44   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-14 21:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf: Reject a store through a fault prone pointer Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-14 22:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 23:26     ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-16 19:54   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16 20:02     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-14 21:52 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2026-08-16 20:06   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] bpf: Rewrite any fault prone load out of a mem or btf_id pointer Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-14 21:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for pointer type merge at a shared load Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-14 22:56   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 23:35     ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-16 22:24   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-16 22:32   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-17  8:08     ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-14 21:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for fault prone loads out of RCU pointers Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-14 22:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 22:28     ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-16 22:24   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-14 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] bpf: Keep fault protection when merging pointer types sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 22:19   ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-08-16 19:42 ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814215301.709827-4-daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox