BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ratheesh Kannoth" <rkannoth@marvell.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix NULL deref of af_xdp_zc_qidx on rep setup
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:56:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260822105627.106C21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821105536.2998765-1-rkannoth@marvell.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch adds NULL checks before test_bit() but misses set_bit() and clear_bit() on af_xdp_zc_qidx, leaving a probe race condition that leads to a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] NAPI is not disabled during XSK pool setup, causing a data race on the completion queue.
- [High] Incorrect conditional check for XDP queues when attaching XSK buffer pools leads to misconfiguration and breaks zero-copy TX.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix NULL deref of af_xdp_zc_qidx on rep setup ---
commit 5f1a1574e7a51207651e67a7a10d7e4ef025c443
Author: Suman Ghosh <sumang@marvell.com>

octeontx2-pf: fix NULL deref of af_xdp_zc_qidx on rep setup

af_xdp_zc_qidx tracks receive queues using AF_XDP zero-copy and is
allocated during PF/VF probe. Representors and other non-AF_XDP paths
leave the pointer NULL, but several call sites used test_bit() on it
unconditionally.

Switching to devlink eswitch mode creates representors and runs
otx2_init_hw_resources(), which reaches otx2_pool_aq_init() and oopses
when dereferencing the NULL bitmap. Add NULL checks before every
af_xdp_zc_qidx test_bit() use in the RSS, ethtool, XSK, and pool init
paths.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
> index ca73a94db7943..175992188c18a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -333,7 +333,8 @@ int otx2_set_rss_table(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, int ctx_id, const u32 *ind_tbl)
>  	/* Get memory to put this msg */
>  	for (idx = 0; idx < rss->rss_size; idx++) {
>  		/* Ignore the queue if AF_XDP zero copy is enabled */
> -		if (test_bit(ind_tbl[idx], pfvf->af_xdp_zc_qidx))
> +		if (pfvf->af_xdp_zc_qidx &&
> +		    test_bit(ind_tbl[idx], pfvf->af_xdp_zc_qidx))

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since we are adding NULL
checks for test_bit() on af_xdp_zc_qidx, are we missing similar NULL checks
for set_bit() and clear_bit()?

Looking at otx2_probe() in
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c, register_netdev()
is called before pf->af_xdp_zc_qidx is allocated:

drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c:otx2_probe() {
    ...
    err = register_netdev(netdev);
    ...
}

This creates a race window where a userspace program could immediately open
an AF_XDP socket and bind it, invoking otx2_xsk_pool_enable() which calls
set_bit() on the still-NULL pointer:

drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_xsk.c:otx2_xsk_pool_enable() {
    ...
    set_bit(qidx, pf->af_xdp_zc_qidx);
    ...
}

Could this lead to a NULL pointer dereference?

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does the queue index boundary check
in otx2_sq_init() correctly identify XDP queues when attaching XSK buffers?

Looking at drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c:

drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c:otx2_sq_init() {
    ...
    if (qidx > pfvf->hw.xdp_queues)
        otx2_attach_xsk_buff(pfvf, sq, (qidx - pfvf->hw.xdp_queues));
    ...
}

If there are more normal TX queues than XDP queues (for example, 4 TX queues
and 2 XDP queues), normal TX queues (indexed 0 to 3) will evaluate to true
(e.g., 3 > 2) and erroneously receive an XSK pool.

Concurrently, the first XDP queue (index 2) would fail the evaluation
(2 > 2 is false) and its xsk_pool remains NULL.

Could this break zero-copy TX on the first XDP queue and corrupt normal
TX queues when otx2_tx_napi_handler() injects packets concurrently?

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_xsk.c
> index 7d67b4cbaf716..0e8a6a6486c4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_xsk.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ int otx2_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_id, u32 flags)
>  
>  void otx2_attach_xsk_buff(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, struct otx2_snd_queue *sq, int qidx)
>  {
> -	if (test_bit(qidx, pfvf->af_xdp_zc_qidx))
> +	if (pfvf->af_xdp_zc_qidx &&
> +	    test_bit(qidx, pfvf->af_xdp_zc_qidx))
>  		sq->xsk_pool = xsk_get_pool_from_qid(pfvf->netdev, qidx);
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at how AF_XDP pools are enabled
in otx2_xsk_pool_enable() in this same file, it modifies the completion
queue hardware context without first disabling NAPI:

drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_xsk.c:otx2_xsk_pool_enable() {
    ...
    otx2_clean_up_rq(pf, qidx);
    ...
}

drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c:otx2_cleanup_rx_cqes() {
    ...
    while (cq->pend_cqe) {
        cqe = (struct nix_cqe_rx_s *)otx2_get_next_cqe(cq);
    ...
}

If traffic arrives concurrently and otx2_napi_handler() in softirq context
polls the same completion queue simultaneously, can this cause a data race
and corrupt the completion queue?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821105536.2998765-1-rkannoth@marvell.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-22 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 10:55 [PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix NULL deref of af_xdp_zc_qidx on rep setup Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-08-22 10:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 19:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260822105627.106C21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkannoth@marvell.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox